Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Githunt VS RawGit

Compare Githunt VS RawGit and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Githunt logo Githunt

Explore the top projects on GitHub 🏆

RawGit logo RawGit

RawGit serves raw files directly from GitHub with proper content-type headers.
  • Githunt Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • RawGit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-23

Githunt features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Githunt offers a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and discover trending GitHub repositories.
  • Daily Updates
    The platform provides daily updates of trending repositories, ensuring users have access to the most current popular projects.
  • Category Filtering
    Users can filter repositories by language and time frame, allowing for more tailored and relevant search results.
  • Streamlined Discovery
    Githunt simplifies the process of finding trending repositories, saving users time and effort compared to searching directly on GitHub.

Possible disadvantages of Githunt

  • Limited Scope
    The platform mainly focuses on trending repositories, which might overlook less popular but high-quality projects.
  • Dependence on GitHub API
    Githunt relies heavily on GitHub's API for data, and any changes or limitations to the API could affect its functionality.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Githunt is more suited for basic searches and lacks advanced features and filters that a more intensive search might require.

RawGit features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    RawGit provides an easy way to serve files directly from a GitHub repository with simple URL access, requiring minimal setup.
  • Convenient for Demos
    It allows developers to quickly demo a webpage or tool hosted in a GitHub repository without deploying it to a dedicated server.
  • CORS Support
    RawGit has Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) headers enabled, which makes it easier to include resources hosted on GitHub into web projects.

Possible disadvantages of RawGit

  • Not Suitable for Production
    RawGit explicitly states that it is not intended for production use due to lack of scalability and potential reliability issues.
  • Limited Bandwidth
    The service is limited by bandwidth and usage restrictions, which may result in files being inaccessible if usage exceeds certain limits.
  • Deprecation Warning
    As of the last updates, RawGit announced it was shutting down and encouraged users to switch to alternative solutions for hosting files.

Githunt videos

No Githunt videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

RawGit videos

Host a CSS or JS file on Gist and redirect through RawGit CDN

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Githunt and RawGit)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
GitHub
100 100%
0% 0
CDN
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Githunt and RawGit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Githunt and RawGit, you can also consider the following products

Github Trending Plus - An experimental Github/trending user interface

Statically - The free optimization & CDN for images, CSS, JavaScript, and open source.

I Code Dis - Discover, submit and upvote the best GitHub repos

jsDelivr - A free, fast, and reliable Open Source CDN for npm and GitHub with the largest network and best performance from all OSS CDNs. Serving 100 billion requests per month.

GitHub + Slack Integration - Full visibility into your GitHub projects right inside Slack

raw.githack.com - raw.githack.com serves raw files from github.com with proper Content-Type headers (like rawgit.