GitHub Personal Website Generator VS Commit Together by Github

GitHub Personal Website Generator

Generate a personal website based on GitHub contributions

Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Landing page //
2023-10-01

Landing page //
2022-11-04

GitHub Personal Website Generator

Website: github.dev

Edit details

GitHub Personal Website Generator features and specs

Ease of Use
GitHub Personal Website Generator is user-friendly, allowing users to quickly generate a personal website without in-depth knowledge of web development.
Integration with GitHub
The generator integrates seamlessly with your GitHub account, allowing for easy deployment of your website directly from your repositories.
Cost-Effective
Since it's hosted on GitHub Pages, you can create and maintain a personal website without incurring hosting costs.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Personal Website Generator

Limited Customization
While easy to use, the tool may not offer the level of customization that more advanced users might need to truly personalize their website.
Technical Limitations
There might be restrictions on the type and complexity of content that can be hosted, given that GitHub Pages is static site-oriented.
Learning Curve for Beginners
While designed to be user-friendly, complete beginners might still face a slight learning curve understanding Git and GitHub's workflow.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

Enhanced Collaboration
Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
Improved Code Review Process
With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
Accountability
By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
Efficiency in Pair Programming
When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

Complex Commit History
Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
Potential Workflow Conflicts
Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
Initial Setup Overhead
Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
Tooling Compatibility
Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Personal Website Generator and Commit Together by Github)

GitHub Personal Website Generator

Commit Together by Github

Developer Tools

58 58%

Developer Tools

42% 42

Productivity

0 0%

Productivity

100% 100

Web App

100 100%

Web App

0% 0

GitHub

100 100%

GitHub

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Personal Website Generator and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Personal Website Generator should be more popular than Commit Together by Github. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Personal Website Generator mentions (9)

Who Needs Software for Development Anyway?
The GitHub code editor (immediately accessible by changing the ".com" to ".dev" in your browser URL, in case you didn't know) is miles, leagues ahead of what AWS has to offer. It has a full, working version of vscode.dev, which is pretty much the same as github.dev those days, I hear. It will allow you to install supported extensions, do some code completion, run your tests - and even has a shell! You can't... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
How Does GitHub Work?
It'll be interesting to see how things evolve over time though – with https://github.dev/github/dev it seems like Github is trending towards trying to solve similar problems as Vercel or Replit. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Learning iOS development
The browser version of VS Code offered by Github is actually better than Xcode in a lot of ways. Apple should find this situation supremely embarrassing. I'm sure the engineers who work on Xcode know that it's completely fucked, but their higher-ups don't give them the resources needed to actually fix it. Source: over 2 years ago
how is made https://github.dev/github/dev without microsoft loyalities/copyright agreement? thx
How is made https://github.dev/github/dev without microsoft loyalities/copyright agreement? thx. Source: over 2 years ago
[General] TIL you can replace '.com' in a github repo or PR URL with '.dev' to open it in github.dev, a VS Code environment running in your browser
Swap .com with .dev in the URL. For example, this repo https://github.com/github/dev becomes http://github.dev/github/dev. Source: almost 3 years ago

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago