
Vercel
Netlify
Cloudflare Pages
Jekyll
surge.sh
Neocities
tiiny.host
A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub
Cappuccino
Elytra
Enkel
Inoreader
Nooshub
Reeder
Feedibus
Open source & beautiful RSS reader

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than Winds. While we know about 505 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Winds.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
W
Winds
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | pages.github.com | getstream.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Winds yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Intro to GitHub Pages
More videos
Dungeon Fighter Stormy Winds Review - with Tom Vasel
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Share your experience with using GitHub Pages and Winds. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

GitHub Pages is a free hosting service provided by GitHub, primarily intended for hosting static sites directly from a GitHub repository. While it lacks some of the advanced features found in other platforms, its...
Static Site Generators — It is a good way for developers to build sites on GitHub pages with the help of site generators. Yes, it has the ability to publish and release any static file. But it is recommended to...
We have no reviews of Winds yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

My bookmarks have been public since 1998, and the previous version, bookmarks-v3.0, was a static site generated by Jekyll and published on GitHub Pages: it cost nothing, and for a list of public links it was good enough. The criterion... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
The site itself is a statically generated Next.js app, built in CI and deployed to GitHub Pages via actions/deploy-pages. No server to manage, no hosting bill. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Static sites are fast and cheap to host, but your data goes stale the moment you deploy. This post shows how a SvelteKit portfolio site serves live data from five external sources while still deploying as static HTML to GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Another great solution that looks really nice (although harder to setup) is Winds https://getstream.io/winds/. Source: over 3 years ago
Winds by stream(https://getstream.io/winds/) is now shut down but I did enjoy using it to manage all my RSS feeds. Good thing it's open source been considering self hosting. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
So, I was looking for cool and open source/free RSS readers and found Winds, but I noticed that the GitHub repo said "This repository is no longer maintained; No further Issues or Pull Requests will be considered or approved" and now is... Source: almost 5 years ago
When comparing GitHub Pages and Winds, you can also consider the following products.

Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
Compare Vercel to GitHub Pages or Winds:

Cappuccino is a framework which makes it easy to create advanced web apps.
Compare Cappuccino to GitHub Pages or Winds:

Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
Compare Netlify to GitHub Pages or Winds:


Deploy blazing fast static sites and serverless functions.
Compare Cloudflare Pages to GitHub Pages or Winds:
