
CodersRank
GitHub City
GitWrapped
star-history
GitHub Profile Roast π₯π₯π₯
OpenSauced
Contributions for GitHub
Customize your profile with various plugins and metrics

UI for Apache Kafka
Conduktor
Kafka Manager
KafkaHQ
Kpow by Factor House
Lenses.io
Kafma is a Kafka GUI client and desktop IDE. Debug Kafka fast. Replay production issues locally.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, GitHub Metrics should be more popular than Kafma. It has been mentioned 9 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | kafma.app |
| Pricing | β | |
| Platforms | β | |
| Company | β | Startup from the United States Β· 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of GitHub Metrics yet.
Kafma is a desktop IDE for Kafka built around one idea: a topic is a tab. Consume and produce in one workspace, inspect schemas and lag, and replay any message to another topic. Data Clone copies a production topic β its config, schemas, and a slice of real data masked by your rules β to a local...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0β100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing GitHub Metrics and Kafma.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma combines two Kafka debugging workflows in one desktop app. The Console keeps consuming, inspecting, producing, and replaying messages in one workspace. Data Clone copies a remote topicβs configuration, schemas, and a selected slice of data to a local cluster, with custom masking rules and without modifying the source.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma is designed for hands-on Kafka debugging rather than dashboard-only monitoring. It brings messages, the producer, and topic details into one workspace, while Data Clone makes it easy to bring remote topic context to a local cluster for testing.
Kafma's answer:
Kafma is built for backend developers, platform engineers, data engineers, and SREs who develop, test, or troubleshoot Kafka-based applications.
Kafma's answer:
Kafka debugging often spreads one investigation across terminals, browser tabs, and scratch files. Kafma was built to keep that workflow in one place and make it faster to bring remote Kafka data and schemas into a local test environment.
Share your experience with using GitHub Metrics and Kafma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


This tutorial shows you how to create a fully automated GitHub profile README using GitHub Metrics with custom SVGs and GitHub Actions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Metrics this will generate a detailed stats infographic based on your GitHub Profile. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Another GitHub profile using lowlighter/metrics with a slightly different setup. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Kafkactl is the right tool for scripts, CI jobs, and quick checks. When an investigation means reading many records and moving between topics, schemas, and consumer groups, a Kafka GUI client such as Kafma connects to the same clusters,... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
When comparing GitHub Metrics and Kafma, you can also consider the following products.

The Ultimate Profile For Developers | Turn Your Code Into Your Digital Developer Profile & Get Hired Faster
Compare CodersRank to GitHub Metrics or Kafma:

Open-Source Web GUI for Apache Kafka Management
Compare UI for Apache Kafka to GitHub Metrics or Kafma:

GitHub Ctiy uses ThreeJS to create a 3D city from your GitHub contributions.
Compare GitHub City to GitHub Metrics or Kafma:


View/Share how you contributed to Github over the years
Compare GitWrapped to GitHub Metrics or Kafma:
