
CodersRank
GitHub City
GitWrapped
GitHub Profile Roast ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ
OpenSauced
Contributions for GitHub
GitHub Contributions
Customize your profile with various plugins and metrics

Conduktor
UI for Apache Kafka
Kpow by Factor House
KafkaHQ
Lenses.io
Redis Commander
Another Redis DeskTop Manager
Self-hosted console for Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis: one permission model, production guardrails and a tamper-evident audit trail.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, GitHub Metrics seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 9 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | broka.dev |
| Pricing | โ | |
| Platforms | โ | |
| Company | โ | Startup from Turkey ยท 1 - 9 employees ยท 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of GitHub Metrics yet.
BROKA is a self-hosted operations console for Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis, with Memcached operated as a cache. It runs on your own infrastructure with Docker Compose; there is no hosted version. โ One permission model: users, teams and scoped roles across every broker you connect. โ...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No GitHub Metrics videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
BROKA โ One platform for your messaging infrastructure
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0โ100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing GitHub Metrics and BROKA.
BROKA's answer:
BROKA operates Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis, with Memcached as a cache, from one self-hosted console. They share one permission model, one set of environments and one tamper-evident audit trail.
Most tools cover a single broker, so a team that runs several ends up with a separate UI, login and permission set for each.
BROKA's answer:
BROKA's answer:
Platform, SRE and backend teams who operate message brokers and caches in production, and the team leads who need to know who can change what, and who did.
BROKA's answer:
Inside one company, different teams often run different brokers with different tools: one team on Kafka with its own UI, another on the RabbitMQ management UI, a third on the Redis CLI. Each has its own logins and permissions, and nobody has one picture of which service uses which topic or queue, who owns it, or who changed what.
The changes that hurt are usually the routine ones, like an offset reset on the wrong consumer group or a purge on the wrong queue. BROKA puts those brokers under the same roles, guardrails and audit trail.
BROKA's answer:
Share your experience with using GitHub Metrics and BROKA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


This tutorial shows you how to create a fully automated GitHub profile README using GitHub Metrics with custom SVGs and GitHub Actions. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Metrics this will generate a detailed stats infographic based on your GitHub Profile. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Another GitHub profile using lowlighter/metrics with a slightly different setup. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Tracking BROKA since Nov 2026.
When comparing GitHub Metrics and BROKA, you can also consider the following products.

The Ultimate Profile For Developers | Turn Your Code Into Your Digital Developer Profile & Get Hired Faster
Compare CodersRank to GitHub Metrics or BROKA:


GitHub Ctiy uses ThreeJS to create a 3D city from your GitHub contributions.
Compare GitHub City to GitHub Metrics or BROKA:

Open-Source Web GUI for Apache Kafka Management
Compare UI for Apache Kafka to GitHub Metrics or BROKA:

View/Share how you contributed to Github over the years
Compare GitWrapped to GitHub Metrics or BROKA:

Advanced Apache Kafka UI for monitoring and analytics
Compare Kpow by Factor House to GitHub Metrics or BROKA: