Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

GitHub Contributions VS Relinka

Compare GitHub Contributions VS Relinka and see what are their differences

GitHub Contributions

All your GitHub contributions in one image

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Relinka

Free internal-linking plugin for WordPress — private, explainable, reversible.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium $59 / Annually (Pro, 1 site)
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Grapple
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, GitHub Contributions seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 0
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
65 vs 32

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

GitHub Contributions
Relinka
Website github-contributions.vercel.app krafts-ai.com
Pricing
Open source
Open source Freemium $59 / Annually (Pro, 1 site) Official pricing
Platforms —
Wordpress
Company — 2026
Listed in
Developer Tools Web App GitHub Analytics +1
WordPress WordPress Plugins SEO Internal Linking Content Optimization +2

About GitHub Contributions and Relinka

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

GitHub Contributions
Relinka

No description of GitHub Contributions yet.

Relinka is a free WordPress plugin for internal linking. It maps how your posts connect, scores your internal-link health (0–100), finds orphaned and broken internal links, and suggests relevant links — each with a one-sentence reason and an anchor taken from your own text. Apply or undo any...

Read more about Relinka

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

GitHub Contributions 4 features
Relinka 3 features
  • Engagement Visualization
    GitHub Contributions offers a visual representation of a user's activity, making it easier to understand coding engagement over time.
  • Motivation Boost
    Seeing contributions grow can motivate users to stay active and engaged in their projects, fostering a consistent coding habit.
  • Personal Progress Tracking
    It allows users to track their personal development and see how their contributions evolve, which can be helpful for setting and achieving coding goals.
  • Public Portfolio
    Serves as a public portfolio that showcases a developer's skills and contributions to recruiters or collaborators who might view their profile.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pressure and Stress
    The focus on daily contributions might cause unnecessary stress and pressure to maintain streaks, potentially prioritizing quantity over quality.
  • Misleading Activity Representation
    The contribution graph may not accurately represent meaningful work, as it doesn't necessarily distinguish between minor and major contributions.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Users looking for more privacy might find the public display of contributions uncomfortable, as it can reveal work habits and patterns.
  • Focus Shift
    Developers might focus too much on maintaining green squares rather than prioritizing learning, meaningful contributions, or quality work.
  • Internal-link health score
    A 0-100 score computed from your own site
  • Orphan & broken-link finder
    Find and fix orphaned and dead internal links in one list
  • Reason-based link suggestions
    Each with a one-sentence reason and a verbatim anchor; one-click undo

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

GitHub Contributions
Relinka

No analysis of GitHub Contributions yet.

Overall verdict

  • Relinka (krafts-ai.com) appears to be a niche AI-powered tool, but there is limited independent verification, widespread user reviews, or established track record available to confirm its overall quality and reliability.

Why this product is good

  • Positioned as an AI-driven solution, which may offer automation or efficiency benefits
  • Lacks extensive third-party reviews or reputation data to fully validate claims
  • Website and branding suggest a newer or smaller-scale product, which may mean limited support infrastructure
  • Potential value depends heavily on specific use case fit, which isn't clearly verified

Recommended for

  • Early adopters willing to test emerging AI tools
  • Users seeking niche AI solutions who are comfortable with limited public reviews
  • Those who can independently verify functionality and security before committing
  • Not recommended for users requiring well-established, heavily vetted platforms for critical business use

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
GitHub Contributions
Relinka
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
SEO
100% 100%
100% 100%
GitHub
0% 0%
0% 0%
WordPress
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Contributions and Relinka. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

GitHub Contributions 1 mention
Relinka 0 mentions
  • The hidden story behind your GitHub contribution chart
    Funnily enough, this tool isn't new but it's been there since 2018 and you can find it at https://github-contributions.vercel.app/. Source: almost 4 years ago

Tracking Relinka since Jun 2026.

Alternatives to GitHub Contributions and Relinka

When comparing GitHub Contributions and Relinka, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...