GitBook
Docusaurus
Mintlify Writer
ReadMe
Git
Atlassian Bitbucket Server
Confluence
GitKraken
Teletype for Atom
CodeShare.io
Visual Studio Live Share
CodeTogether
Dabblet
Liveweave
Codeply
CSSDeck
GitBook
Teletype for AtomNo Teletype for Atom videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Teletype for Atom might be a bit more popular than GitBook. We know about 6 links to it since March 2021 and only 6 links to GitBook. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
GitBook is simple and clean, and sometimes thatโs exactly what you need. I like it for early-stage products or teams with lighter documentation. Youโll eventually hit limits if your structure gets more complex, but if simplicity is your priority, itโs a solid choice. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
TL,DR: LaunchDarkly is great for B2C companies. Bucket is for B2B SaaS products, like GitBook โ a modern, AI-integrated documentation platform. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Addison Schultz, Developer Relations Lead at GitBook, puts it simply:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Good question that led to insightful responses. I would like to bring GitBook (https://gitbook.com) too to the comparison notes (no affiliation). They, too, focus on the collaborative, 'similar-to-git-workflow', and versioned approach towards documentation. Happy to see variety in the 'docs' tools area, and really appreciate it being FOSS. Looking forward to trying out Kalmia on some project soon. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Focusing on the reason stated โpair programmingโ ask your employer if you can use live share for VSCode or teletype for atom instead. Pair programming works great in certain situations but screen sharing is the absolute worst way to get this done. Source: about 4 years ago
Teletype: this is one of the highlight features of Atom as it allows you to share your entire workspace and edit code together in real-time. Source: over 4 years ago
Some code editors have plugins to allow the developers to create collaboration sessions. Visual Studio has Live Share and Atom has Teletype. But the invitees need to install the editor to be able to join the session. Until today. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Teletype for Atom might be what you're looking for. Also, haven't used yet, but a quick Google search shows me something like this also exists. Source: about 5 years ago
Hi there! I'd like to implement something similar to Teletype's way of connection. It briefly works this way: first the clients (peers) connect to an external server, then they somehow manage to establish a peer-to-peer connection to stop using the server and talk to each other. No need to open router ports in any of the peers. Source: over 5 years ago
Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
CodeShare.io - Realtime code sharing for developers
Mintlify Writer - The AI-powered documentation writer. It's documentation that just appears as you build
Visual Studio Live Share - Real-time collaborative development
ReadMe - A collaborative developer hub for your API or code.
CodeTogether - Live share IDEs and coding sessions. See changes in real time.