Software Alternatives & Startups

Git-appraise VS EditorConfig

Compare Git-appraise VS EditorConfig and see what are their differences

Git-appraise

Distributed code review system for Git repos (by Google)

Rating
0 reviews
EditorConfig

EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, EditorConfig seems to be a lot more popular than Git-appraise. While we know about 87 links to EditorConfig, we've tracked only 7 mentions of Git-appraise.

social mentions
7 vs 87
Text Editors popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
9 vs 43

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Git-appraise
EditorConfig
Website github.com editorconfig.org
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Git-appraise 0 features
EditorConfig 4 features

No features have been listed yet.

  • Consistency Across Editors
    EditorConfig helps maintain consistent coding styles for multiple developers working on the same project across various editors and IDEs. This ensures that all developers adhere to the same coding standards, minimizing discrepancies in code formatting.
  • Ease of Use
    EditorConfig files are simple to set up and use. Once the configuration file is in place, any supported editor with the EditorConfig plugin installed will automatically enforce the styles, requiring minimal ongoing maintenance from developers.
  • Compatibility
    EditorConfig is compatible with a wide range of editors and IDEs through plugins, allowing developers to use their preferred development environment while still adhering to project-wide formatting rules.
  • Source Control Friendliness
    By enforcing consistent styles, EditorConfig reduces the likelihood of unnecessary code diffs caused by differing formatting preferences, making version control diffs cleaner and easier to understand.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Scope
    EditorConfig focuses primarily on basic whitespace and file-ending settings. It does not provide comprehensive style enforcement, such as linting for programming language-specific syntax rules or convention enforcement beyond formatting.
  • Requires Editor Support
    EditorConfig requires either native support or plugins to be installed in the editor or IDE. If a developer is using an unsupported editor or does not have the plugin installed, they may not benefit from the configuration.
  • Potential for Inconsistencies
    Depending on the implementation of the EditorConfig plugin in specific editors, there can be slight differences in how rules are applied. This can potentially lead to inconsistencies if not all team members use the same tools or versions.
  • Basic Feature Set
    EditorConfig’s feature set is relatively basic compared to other tools that offer more robust configurations and checks, such as full-featured code linters and formatters that enforce a wider array of coding conventions and rules.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Git-appraise 0 videos + Add
EditorConfig 3 videos + Add

No Git-appraise videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

EditorConfig, A tool I include in all my projects

More videos

  • - Detecting missing ConfigureAwait with FxCop and EditorConfig - Dotnetos 5-minute Code Reviews
  • - 15 Visual Studio Editor Tips including Intellicode and EditorConfig

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Git-appraise
EditorConfig
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Git-appraise and EditorConfig. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Git-appraise 7 mentions
EditorConfig 87 mentions
  • The August 17 outage, and the work ahead
    I'm particularly fond of the concepts within git-appraise, gits back to the federated foundations https://github.com/google/git-appraise (unmaintained). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Gleam Is Now on Tangled
    This was a really intriguing project that became Google abandonware. https://github.com/google/git-appraise The idea is to use git-notes for issues & PRs, because git is already distributed by design and these elements of SDLC... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • If I Could Make My Own GitHub
    There were a few efforts like this back in the day (when people still cared about offline and store-and-forward-style operation[1]), like Bugs Everywhere[3], git-appraise[4] notable for storing its data in Git’s little-known “notes”... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

View more

  • Coding in Style
    I can update the indentation configuration in neovim, but I think a much nicer option and better convention would be to set up .editorconfig. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Writing a Good Claude.md
    - tokens are relatively cheap but they're not free on a paid plan; why spend tokens on something linters and formatters can do deterministically and for free? If you wanted Claude Code to handle linting automatically, you're better off... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Tabs vs. Spaces: The War Is Over
    I’ve also been tinkering around with AI-Coding assistants, having fun and learning many of the missing steps from my career. As someone who loved to write codes that are well formatted, well named, and well organized, the one thing I... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to Git-appraise and EditorConfig

When comparing Git-appraise and EditorConfig, you can also consider the following products.