Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

giscus VS Wave

Compare giscus VS Wave and see what are their differences

Proton Drive for Business
End-to-end encrypted cloud storage built for teams. Keep all your business data private, fully secure, and under your complete control. No backdoors, no tracking, no compromises. Swiss privacy laws and zero-knowledge encryption protect what matters. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

giscus logo giscus

A comments system powered by GitHub Discussions. Let visitors leave comments and reactions on your website via GitHub!

Wave logo Wave

Mobile money, reinvented. Deposit, withdraw, pay bills for free. Send for only 1%.
  • giscus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-22
  • Wave Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-06

giscus features and specs

  • GitHub Integration
    Giscus leverages GitHub Discussions for comment management, which means that it inherits all the collaborative features and ecosystem integration of GitHub.
  • Privacy-Focused
    Since it uses GitHub for comments, Giscus does not track users or show ads, making it a more privacy-friendly alternative to other commenting systems.
  • Open Source
    Giscus is open-source, allowing developers to inspect the code, contribute to its development, and ensure that there are no hidden functionalities.
  • Easy Integration
    Adding Giscus to a website is straightforward and well-documented, requiring minimal effort to get up and running.
  • Markdown Support
    Comments in Giscus support Markdown, which allows users to format their messages easily and include features like code snippets.

Possible disadvantages of giscus

  • GitHub Account Requirement
    Users need a GitHub account to participate in discussions, which might limit engagement from non-developer audiences or those unwilling to create an account.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    The system is heavily dependent on the availability and reliability of GitHub's services, making it vulnerable to outages or changes in GitHub's API.
  • Potential Complexity
    The need to manage comments through GitHub Discussions might introduce complexity for users who are unfamiliar with GitHub's interface.
  • Limited Customization
    Customization options for the appearance and behavior of the comment section are less extensive compared to some other commenting platforms.
  • No Anonymous Comments
    The requirement for a GitHub account means that anonymous commenting is not an option, which might deter some users from participating.

Wave features and specs

  • Cost
    Wave offers a suite of financial services without any recurring fees, making it an affordable option for small businesses and freelancers.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Wave provides an intuitive, easy-to-navigate interface that caters to users with limited accounting knowledge.
  • Integrated Platform
    Wave integrates various financial tools like invoicing, accounting, and receipt scanning into a single platform, streamlining business operations.
  • Cloud-Based
    As a cloud-based solution, Wave allows users to access their financial information from any internet-enabled device.
  • Multi-Currency Support
    Wave supports invoicing and accounting in multiple currencies, which is beneficial for businesses dealing with international clients.

Possible disadvantages of Wave

  • Limited Features
    While it covers basic needs, Wave lacks some advanced features such as project management and time tracking that other accounting software offer.
  • Customer Support
    Wave's customer support primarily relies on self-help resources, which may be insufficient for complex issues requiring immediate assistance.
  • Limited Integrations
    Wave offers fewer third-party integrations compared to competitors, which might limit its functionality for businesses using other specific tools.
  • Scalability
    The software is geared towards small businesses and freelancers; as businesses scale up, they might find Wave's offerings insufficient.
  • Automatic Bank Reconciliation
    Wave's automatic bank reconciliation features can sometimes be unreliable, leading to inaccurate financial data if not closely monitored.

giscus videos

No giscus videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Wave videos

+ Add

Wave review

More videos:

  • Review - Wave Free Accounting Review - Is This Good For Your Small Business?
  • Review - WAVE REVIEW: ๐Ÿ›‘ HOW I MADE OVER $500 A DAY WITH WAVE

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to giscus and Wave)

giscus

Wave

Social Networks
100 100%
Social Networks
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using giscus and Wave. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, giscus seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 33 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

giscus mentions (33)

  • Leave a Trace
    Maybe giscus https://giscus.app/ It works for static sites, you just need to embed their script, and spam and moderation would be handled by GitHub. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Don't rent the cloud, own instead
    Look the bottom of that page: An error occurred: API rate limit already exceeded for installation ID 73591946. Error from https://giscus.app/ Fellow says one thing and uses another. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Disqus Turned My Blog into an Ad Farm โ€“ So I Killed It
    I did the same. I was sad to lose the comments, but the ads were awful and I don't particularly want someone elses ads / tracking on my hobby site. I switched to gisqus [1], which is powered by GitHub discussions, which seems to be working ok. (The site is hosted on GH pages so seems reasonable to also use GH discussions for the comments.) [1] https://giscus.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Rewriting my blog in plain HTML
    3) No commenting feature, luckily I found your post here on HN. But it would be better to have comment blocks, like from https://giscus.app/ or just a link where readers can comment. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Best self-hosted wiki for local communities?
    If you're a developer, you might start by using a static site generator and GitHub Pages. Stick to Markdown and start collecting and writing stuff. Sooner or later you'll get comments and regular readers. Then you might start to add editing or simply give other people access to GitHub. The editing experience of Markdown files in GitHub is not too bad and you get started in no time. From my experience it's more... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Wave mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Wave yet. Tracking of Wave recommendations started around Sep 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing giscus and Wave, you can also consider the following products

DISQUS - Disqus is a global comment system that improves discussion on websites and connects conversations across the web.

Siteimprove - Consider the Siteimprove Intelligence Platform the newest member of your team.

utterances - A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues.

axe DevTools - Efficient and effective accessibility testing is here.

ReplyBox - ReplyBox, a simple, honest comment system. No ads, no dodgy affiliate links, no fluff.

accessiBe - Making websites accessible to people with disabilities

Loading...