Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

giscus VS Quickly Plus

Compare giscus VS Quickly Plus and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

giscus logo giscus

A comments system powered by GitHub Discussions. Let visitors leave comments and reactions on your website via GitHub!

Quickly Plus logo Quickly Plus

Hand picked frameworks, books and more for digital success.
  • giscus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-22
  • Quickly Plus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-15

giscus features and specs

  • GitHub Integration
    Giscus leverages GitHub Discussions for comment management, which means that it inherits all the collaborative features and ecosystem integration of GitHub.
  • Privacy-Focused
    Since it uses GitHub for comments, Giscus does not track users or show ads, making it a more privacy-friendly alternative to other commenting systems.
  • Open Source
    Giscus is open-source, allowing developers to inspect the code, contribute to its development, and ensure that there are no hidden functionalities.
  • Easy Integration
    Adding Giscus to a website is straightforward and well-documented, requiring minimal effort to get up and running.
  • Markdown Support
    Comments in Giscus support Markdown, which allows users to format their messages easily and include features like code snippets.

Possible disadvantages of giscus

  • GitHub Account Requirement
    Users need a GitHub account to participate in discussions, which might limit engagement from non-developer audiences or those unwilling to create an account.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    The system is heavily dependent on the availability and reliability of GitHub's services, making it vulnerable to outages or changes in GitHub's API.
  • Potential Complexity
    The need to manage comments through GitHub Discussions might introduce complexity for users who are unfamiliar with GitHub's interface.
  • Limited Customization
    Customization options for the appearance and behavior of the comment section are less extensive compared to some other commenting platforms.
  • No Anonymous Comments
    The requirement for a GitHub account means that anonymous commenting is not an option, which might deter some users from participating.

Quickly Plus features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Quickly Plus offers a simple and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users of all technical levels to navigate the platform and utilize its features effectively.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform supports seamless integration with various third-party applications and tools, allowing users to synchronize their workflows and improve productivity.
  • Comprehensive Features
    Quickly Plus provides a wide range of features catering to different user needs, from project management to communication tools, which helps in streamlining business processes.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to accommodate growing businesses, offering scalable solutions that can expand with increasing operational demands.

Possible disadvantages of Quickly Plus

  • Pricing
    Some users may find Quickly Plus's pricing plans to be on the higher side, which could be a barrier for small businesses or individuals working with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, new users might experience a learning curve in fully understanding and utilizing all of the platform's features efficiently.
  • Limited Customization
    The platform might offer fewer customization options compared to competitors, which could limit the ability of users to tailor the tool to their specific needs.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based application, Quickly Plus requires a stable internet connection, which can be a drawback for users in areas with unreliable connectivity.

Analysis of Quickly Plus

Overall verdict

  • Quickly Plus appears to be a service focused on speed and efficiency, but since I don't have verified independent information about quickly.plus, I'd recommend researching current user reviews and verifying its features before committing.

Why this product is good

  • Positions itself around fast, streamlined service delivery which can save users time
  • May offer a straightforward, easy-to-use interface for quick task completion
  • Could provide competitive pricing or convenient features for its target audience

Recommended for

  • Users prioritizing speed and quick turnaround on tasks
  • People who prefer simple, no-friction tools
  • Those willing to try newer services after checking recent reviews and terms

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to giscus and Quickly Plus)
Social Networks
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using giscus and Quickly Plus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, giscus seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 33 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

giscus mentions (33)

  • Leave a Trace
    Maybe giscus https://giscus.app/ It works for static sites, you just need to embed their script, and spam and moderation would be handled by GitHub. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Don't rent the cloud, own instead
    Look the bottom of that page: An error occurred: API rate limit already exceeded for installation ID 73591946. Error from https://giscus.app/ Fellow says one thing and uses another. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Disqus Turned My Blog into an Ad Farm – So I Killed It
    I did the same. I was sad to lose the comments, but the ads were awful and I don't particularly want someone elses ads / tracking on my hobby site. I switched to gisqus [1], which is powered by GitHub discussions, which seems to be working ok. (The site is hosted on GH pages so seems reasonable to also use GH discussions for the comments.) [1] https://giscus.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Rewriting my blog in plain HTML
    3) No commenting feature, luckily I found your post here on HN. But it would be better to have comment blocks, like from https://giscus.app/ or just a link where readers can comment. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Best self-hosted wiki for local communities?
    If you're a developer, you might start by using a static site generator and GitHub Pages. Stick to Markdown and start collecting and writing stuff. Sooner or later you'll get comments and regular readers. Then you might start to add editing or simply give other people access to GitHub. The editing experience of Markdown files in GitHub is not too bad and you get started in no time. From my experience it's more... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Quickly Plus mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Quickly Plus yet. Tracking of Quickly Plus recommendations started around Mar 2023.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing giscus and Quickly Plus, you can also consider the following products

DISQUS - Disqus is a global comment system that improves discussion on websites and connects conversations across the web.

BuildSuperfast - Find out what users are saying about BuildSuperfast. Read user BuildSuperfast reviews, pricing information and what features it offers.

utterances - A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues.

Concrete - Better retail execution and store performance with coordinated communications and task management.

ReplyBox - ReplyBox, a simple, honest comment system. No ads, no dodgy affiliate links, no fluff.

DevFast - Easily hire vetted developers, quickly!