Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

giscus VS Does.qa

Compare giscus VS Does.qa and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

giscus logo giscus

A comments system powered by GitHub Discussions. Let visitors leave comments and reactions on your website via GitHub!

Does.qa logo Does.qa

DoesQA is a no-code solution which unlocks the power of automation testing for everyone in every project.
  • giscus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-22
  • Does.qa
    Image date //
    2024-07-09

DoesQA is Codeless test automation that's more powerful than code! Any team member can create complex automation tests easily, enabling QA to keep pace with development and build coverage while reducing costs.

DoesQA doesn't just make the easy stuff easier; our codeless test automation tool also supports API integrations, Visual Regression, Pa11y, Lighthouse, and many more.

You'll be able to create tests in minutes which would have taken months in code.

giscus

Website
giscus.app
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Does.qa

Website
does.qa
$ Details
paid Free Trial $95 / Monthly (Unlimited Testing, Unlimited Users, 10 Parallel Runners)
Platforms
Google Chrome Firefox Edge
Release Date
2023 March

giscus features and specs

  • GitHub Integration
    Giscus leverages GitHub Discussions for comment management, which means that it inherits all the collaborative features and ecosystem integration of GitHub.
  • Privacy-Focused
    Since it uses GitHub for comments, Giscus does not track users or show ads, making it a more privacy-friendly alternative to other commenting systems.
  • Open Source
    Giscus is open-source, allowing developers to inspect the code, contribute to its development, and ensure that there are no hidden functionalities.
  • Easy Integration
    Adding Giscus to a website is straightforward and well-documented, requiring minimal effort to get up and running.
  • Markdown Support
    Comments in Giscus support Markdown, which allows users to format their messages easily and include features like code snippets.

Possible disadvantages of giscus

  • GitHub Account Requirement
    Users need a GitHub account to participate in discussions, which might limit engagement from non-developer audiences or those unwilling to create an account.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    The system is heavily dependent on the availability and reliability of GitHub's services, making it vulnerable to outages or changes in GitHub's API.
  • Potential Complexity
    The need to manage comments through GitHub Discussions might introduce complexity for users who are unfamiliar with GitHub's interface.
  • Limited Customization
    Customization options for the appearance and behavior of the comment section are less extensive compared to some other commenting platforms.
  • No Anonymous Comments
    The requirement for a GitHub account means that anonymous commenting is not an option, which might deter some users from participating.

Does.qa features and specs

  • Unlimited Concurrency
  • Multi-browser
  • Drag-and-drop UI
  • Lighthouse
  • Visual Regression
  • Pa11y
  • API
  • Slack Integration
  • CI/CD
  • Scheduling
  • Email Testing
  • Generate Authentic MFA Tokens

giscus videos

No giscus videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Does.qa videos

Introduction to DoesQA

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to giscus and Does.qa)
Social Networks
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing giscus and Does.qa.

What makes your product unique?

Does.qa's answer:

DoesQA simplifies test creation and improves reliability while keeping the tester in control. With unlimited concurrency as standard there's no faster way to create or run your tests.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Does.qa's answer:

DoesQA is the only solution which supports branching tests, API requests and Lighthouse Audits. DoesQA was built by experienced SDETs to make testing simpler, faster and more cost-effective while allowing all the power which comes with a traditional code-based solution.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Does.qa's answer:

Engineering teams who want powerful web end-to-end automation tests without the costs typically associated with building a test framework and running tests remotely.

What's the story behind your product?

Does.qa's answer:

Everyone's endlessly wasting money building their own test framework.

User comments

Share your experience with using giscus and Does.qa. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, giscus seems to be a lot more popular than Does.qa. While we know about 33 links to giscus, we've tracked only 1 mention of Does.qa. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

giscus mentions (33)

  • Leave a Trace
    Maybe giscus https://giscus.app/ It works for static sites, you just need to embed their script, and spam and moderation would be handled by GitHub. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Don't rent the cloud, own instead
    Look the bottom of that page: An error occurred: API rate limit already exceeded for installation ID 73591946. Error from https://giscus.app/ Fellow says one thing and uses another. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Disqus Turned My Blog into an Ad Farm – So I Killed It
    I did the same. I was sad to lose the comments, but the ads were awful and I don't particularly want someone elses ads / tracking on my hobby site. I switched to gisqus [1], which is powered by GitHub discussions, which seems to be working ok. (The site is hosted on GH pages so seems reasonable to also use GH discussions for the comments.) [1] https://giscus.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Rewriting my blog in plain HTML
    3) No commenting feature, luckily I found your post here on HN. But it would be better to have comment blocks, like from https://giscus.app/ or just a link where readers can comment. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Best self-hosted wiki for local communities?
    If you're a developer, you might start by using a static site generator and GitHub Pages. Stick to Markdown and start collecting and writing stuff. Sooner or later you'll get comments and regular readers. Then you might start to add editing or simply give other people access to GitHub. The editing experience of Markdown files in GitHub is not too bad and you get started in no time. From my experience it's more... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Does.qa mentions (1)

  • Automation Tool that can handle BOTH Web and Mobile App testing
    Hey, DoesQA here, we have a compatible set of steps as WebdriverIO but as a codeless test automation tool. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing giscus and Does.qa, you can also consider the following products

DISQUS - Disqus is a global comment system that improves discussion on websites and connects conversations across the web.

DogQ.io - No-code tests in cloud for web developers with all skill levels

utterances - A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues.

Testpine - No Code Test Automation for Web & Mobile and Test Management

ReplyBox - ReplyBox, a simple, honest comment system. No ads, no dodgy affiliate links, no fluff.

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) - World’s first full-stack Agentic AI Quality Engineering platform.