Software Alternatives & Startups

Gigvault.app VS Objects

Compare Gigvault.app VS Objects and see what are their differences

Gigvault.app

Free concert tracker & concert diary. Log every show you've been to: setlists and full lineup fill in automatically, festivals stage by stage, Concert Wrapped after every gig. Free forever, no ads. iOS, Android, web, 13 languages.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $2.99 / Monthly (Pro (logging itself is free forever))
Objects

An online tool to create instructions and user manuals for providing quality customer care

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Gigvault.app seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 0
Music popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Gigvault.app
Objects
Website gigvault.app objects.to
Pricing
Freemium $2.99 / Monthly (Pro (logging itself is free forever)) Official pricing
Company Startup from Germany · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 —
Listed in

About Gigvault.app and Objects

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Gigvault.app
Objects

Gigvault is a free concert tracker app and concert diary: log every concert you've been to, keep setlists, photos and notes per show, and get a Concert Wrapped after every gig. Letterboxd for concerts; Spotify Wrapped for shows you actually saw. Not a ticket shop, not gig-economy work: a "gig"...

Read more about Gigvault.app

No description of Objects yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Gigvault.app 10 features
Objects 5 features
  • Free concert logging
    Concert logging is free, unlimited, forever. No credit card, no ads, no data sold, no paywall on your history.
  • Automatic setlists
    Log a show and the setlist, venue and full lineup fill in automatically from 9.9M+ setlists; predicted setlists for upcoming shows.
  • Support act tracking
    Openers, support acts and festival sets are logged as their own shows and count individually in your concert stats.
  • Festival tracker
    Multi-day festivals stage by stage, seen vs. missed, with 2026 lineups for 600+ festivals.
  • Concert Wrapped
    Rebuilt after every show, not once a year: shows, unique bands, cities, minutes live, most-seen artist, top venue, down to the song level.
  • Concert diary
    Photos, videos, notes and a rating per show. Private by default, visibility per upload.
  • Concert Buddies
    See which friends were at the same concerts. Mutual-only, no followers, no algorithm. Feed, messages, tag friends.
  • Setlist tracking (beta)
    Every song from every setlist you attended is counted: songs heard live, most-heard song, first-time songs, your anthems. Pro.
  • Platforms & languages
    iOS, Android and web app (no download needed), synced across devices. 13 languages.
  • Pro (optional, $2.99/mo)
    Unlimited photo/video uploads, Music Identity, Concert Groups with shared expenses, recommendations, advanced analytics, monthly Wrapped, export. Photographer Pro $4.99/mo.
  • Decentralized Object Storage
    Objects.to provides decentralized storage solutions, allowing users to store data across distributed networks rather than relying on a single centralized server, which enhances data resilience and reduces single points of failure.
  • Web3 and Blockchain Integration
    The platform is designed with Web3 principles in mind, making it well-suited for developers building decentralized applications (dApps) that need reliable and censorship-resistant storage.
  • Simple API and Developer Experience
    Objects.to offers a straightforward API that makes it relatively easy for developers to integrate decentralized storage into their projects without needing deep expertise in the underlying protocols.
  • Content Persistence
    Data stored through Objects.to benefits from content-addressable storage mechanisms, helping ensure that files remain available and verifiable over time without risk of link rot or unauthorized modification.
  • Cost-Effective Storage
    Compared to traditional cloud storage providers, Objects.to can offer competitive pricing by leveraging decentralized storage networks, potentially reducing costs for developers and businesses storing large amounts of data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Mainstream Adoption
    Objects.to is a relatively niche platform compared to established cloud storage providers like AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage, which means fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations are available.
  • Performance and Latency Concerns
    Decentralized storage can sometimes suffer from higher latency and slower retrieval speeds compared to centralized cloud services that have globally distributed CDNs and optimized infrastructure.
  • Reliability and Uptime Uncertainty
    As a smaller and newer platform, Objects.to may not offer the same level of guaranteed uptime and SLAs that enterprise-grade centralized storage providers commit to.
  • Learning Curve for Non-Web3 Developers
    Developers unfamiliar with decentralized storage concepts, content addressing, and Web3 paradigms may face a steeper learning curve when adopting Objects.to compared to traditional storage solutions.
  • Limited Documentation and Support
    Being a smaller platform, Objects.to may have less comprehensive documentation, fewer support channels, and slower response times for troubleshooting compared to major cloud providers with dedicated support teams.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Gigvault.app
Objects

No analysis of Gigvault.app yet.

Overall verdict

  • Objects.to is a niche link-in-bio and personal landing page tool. It appears to offer a minimalist way to consolidate links, but it has limited brand recognition compared to major competitors like Linktree, Bio.link, or Beacons, and detailed independent reviews or long-term reliability data are scarce.

Why this product is good

  • Simple, minimalist interface for creating a single landing page
  • Likely free or low-cost tier for basic use cases
  • Quick setup for consolidating multiple links in one place
  • Lightweight alternative if you dislike bloated link-in-bio tools

Recommended for

  • Individuals wanting a very basic, no-frills link page
  • Users experimenting with alternatives to mainstream link-in-bio services
  • Small creators who don't need advanced analytics or customization
  • Those prioritizing simplicity over extensive design options

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Gigvault.app
Objects
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Gigvault.app and Objects.

What makes your product unique?

Gigvault.app's answer

Three things no other concert tracker does together. First, full-lineup tracking: openers, support acts and festival sets are logged as their own shows and count individually in your concert stats, so a festival weekend becomes ten or twenty logged sets instead of one line. Second, automatic setlists: log a show and the setlist, venue and complete lineup fill in from 9.9M+ setlists; upcoming shows get a predicted setlist. Third, Concert Wrapped rebuilt after every show, not once in December, down to the song level (most-heard track live, songs heard live for the first time). On top: a concert diary with photos, videos and notes per show (private by default), a festival tracker with 2026 lineups stage by stage, Concert Buddies (mutual-only, no followers, no algorithm), and 13 languages on iOS, Android and web. And concert logging is free, unlimited, forever: no ads, no credit card, no paywall on your own history.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Gigvault.app's answer

It depends on what you want. setlist.fm is the setlist database with an "I was there" mark, but no diary, no photos per show, no Wrapped and no lineup stats. Bandsintown and Songkick are about upcoming shows and tickets, not the concerts you have been to. Concert Archives keeps a history but has no automatic Wrapped, no festival stage-by-stage tracking and no mutual-only social layer. Spotify Wrapped counts what you streamed, not what you lived. Gigvault is the diary for what you actually saw: setlists and full lineup fill in automatically, support acts and festival sets count as their own shows, photos and notes stay with the night they belong to, Concert Wrapped rebuilds after every show, and Concert Buddies shows which friends were at the same concerts. Concert logging is free, unlimited, forever, with no ads; Pro ($2.99/month) is optional and never locks your own history. iOS, Android and web, 13 languages.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Gigvault.app's answer

Concert-goers and festival fans who want a record of every show they have seen: people who go to a lot of gigs and want to answer "how many times have I seen this band?" or "how many concerts have I been to?" with real numbers, festival regulars who want a whole weekend logged stage by stage, fans who keep ticket stubs and photos and want them tied to the right night, and friends who want to see which shows they have been to together. Gigvault is used across Europe and North America and runs in 13 languages (English, German, French, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Polish, Czech, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Finnish). There is also a separate Photographer Pro plan for people who shoot shows.

What's the story behind your product?

Gigvault.app's answer

Gigvault started in January 2025 as a solo project by Alexandra Pytel in Germany. The trigger was a simple question that turned out to be impossible to answer: how many times have I seen this band? Ticket stubs in a drawer, photos with no context, half a festival weekend nobody could reconstruct. The existing tools stopped at "attended" (setlist.fm) or pointed forward to upcoming shows (Bandsintown, Songkick). So Gigvault became the diary for what you already saw: log a show, the setlist and full lineup fill in automatically, openers and festival sets count as their own entries, and Concert Wrapped updates after every gig instead of once a year. It is still solo-built and self-funded, on iOS, Android and the web, in 13 languages, and concert logging has stayed free, unlimited and ad-free from day one.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Gigvault.app's answer

React with Vite and TypeScript for the web app, Supabase (Postgres, auth, storage, edge functions) as the backend, Capacitor for the native iOS and Android apps from the same codebase, and Lovable for hosting. Setlist and lineup data comes from a database of 9.9M+ setlists. The web app runs in the browser with no download; iOS and Android are in the App Store and Google Play.

User comments

Share your experience with using Gigvault.app and Objects. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Gigvault.app 1 mention
Objects 0 mentions
  • I built a free concert tracker solo: 13 languages, 11,000 prerendered pages, one React codebase for iOS, Android and web
    I go to a lot of concerts. In January 2025 I got tired of a spreadsheet that could not tell me which opener I had seen twice, so I started building Gigvault, a concert diary that logs the shows you actually went to. Twenty months later... - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago

Tracking Objects since Apr 2021.

Alternatives to Gigvault.app and Objects

When comparing Gigvault.app and Objects, you can also consider the following products.