Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

GetSubmitList VS ManualTesting.dev

Compare GetSubmitList VS ManualTesting.dev and see what are their differences

recto
recto finds the pages nothing links to and links them using words you already publishedโ€”no AI rewrite; you approve every change. $39 once, NO SUBSCRIPTION. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

GetSubmitList logo GetSubmitList

Discover more submission sites and systematically manage your product's submission status, Boost your product exposure and traffic acquisition efficiency.

ManualTesting.dev logo ManualTesting.dev

Manual Testing for Developers - Test Management Tool for developers and startups
Not present
  • ManualTesting.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-26

GetSubmitList features and specs

  • Wide Range of Directories
    GetSubmitList offers a comprehensive list of directories across different categories, allowing users to effectively maximize their link-building and SEO efforts.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that makes it simple for users to navigate and find the directories they need.
  • Regular Updates
    GetSubmitList frequently updates its directory listings, ensuring that users have access to the most current and relevant resources for their submissions.
  • Time-Saving
    By providing a curated list of directories, GetSubmitList saves users considerable time and effort in searching for and evaluating potential submission sites.

Possible disadvantages of GetSubmitList

  • Quality of Directories
    While the quantity of directories is vast, the quality can vary, with some directories potentially offering low-value links that can affect a site's SEO negatively.
  • Subscription Cost
    Access to the full range of features and directories may require a subscription, which could be a potential drawback for users seeking free solutions.
  • Overuse Risk
    Relying heavily on directory submissions may lead to an unnatural link profile, which could harm search engine rankings if not managed properly.
  • Manual Submission Effort
    Despite providing lists, users still need to manually submit their sites to each directory, which can be time-consuming for larger campaigns.

ManualTesting.dev features and specs

  • Focused on Manual Testing
    ManualTesting.dev is specifically dedicated to manual testing, providing a niche resource for QA professionals who need to strengthen their manual testing skills rather than being overwhelmed by automation-focused content.
  • Beginner-Friendly
    The platform appears designed to be accessible for those new to software testing, offering foundational knowledge and guidance that helps newcomers enter the QA field without requiring prior technical expertise.
  • Structured Learning Path
    The site offers organized content that guides learners through manual testing concepts in a logical progression, making it easier to build knowledge incrementally rather than jumping between disconnected topics.
  • Practical and Job-Oriented
    The platform focuses on practical, real-world manual testing skills that are directly applicable to job roles, helping testers prepare for actual work scenarios and interviews in QA positions.
  • Free or Affordable Access
    ManualTesting.dev provides accessible content without significant financial barriers, making it a cost-effective option for individuals looking to learn manual testing without investing in expensive courses or certifications.

Possible disadvantages of ManualTesting.dev

  • Limited Scope
    By focusing exclusively on manual testing, the platform may not adequately prepare testers for the modern QA landscape where automation skills are increasingly expected and valued by employers.
  • Relatively Unknown Platform
    ManualTesting.dev is not as well-established or widely recognized as major learning platforms like Udemy, Coursera, or ISTQB resources, which may limit community support and peer interaction.
  • Limited Advanced Content
    The platform may lack depth for experienced QA professionals looking for advanced testing methodologies, complex test strategy development, or specialized domain testing knowledge.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to larger testing communities like Ministry of Testing or Software Testing Help, the platform likely has a smaller user base, resulting in fewer discussion opportunities, peer reviews, and networking possibilities.
  • Content Freshness Concerns
    As a smaller, niche website, there may be concerns about how frequently the content is updated to reflect current industry trends, tools, and best practices in manual testing.

Analysis of GetSubmitList

Overall verdict

  • GetSubmitList appears to be a niche directory/listing submission service aimed at helping websites and startups gain backlinks and visibility through curated directory submissions, but without independent, verifiable performance data or extensive third-party reviews, its overall value is hard to confirm definitivelyโ€”use with reasonable expectations as one small part of a broader SEO strategy.

Why this product is good

  • Offers a straightforward way to submit websites to multiple directories or listing platforms, potentially saving time compared to manual submissions
  • Can help small businesses and startups gain initial backlinks and minor visibility boosts
  • May provide structured categorization that makes it easier for niche or local businesses to get discovered
  • Likely affordable compared to hiring an SEO agency for basic directory submission tasks

Recommended for

  • Startups and small businesses looking for a low-cost way to build initial backlinks
  • Website owners wanting to increase directory-based visibility for local SEO
  • Marketers who want to supplement a broader SEO strategy with basic listing submissions
  • Users who prefer a semi-automated tool over manually submitting to each directory individually

Analysis of ManualTesting.dev

Overall verdict

  • ManualTesting.dev appears to be a niche resource site focused on manual testing concepts, tutorials, and interview preparation for QA professionals. It's a solid, budget-friendly (often free) option for learners wanting to build foundational manual testing skills, though it may lack the depth, interactivity, or certification value of paid, structured courses.

Why this product is good

  • Provides free or low-cost access to manual testing concepts and materials, making it accessible for beginners
  • Focuses specifically on manual testing, offering targeted content rather than generic QA overviews
  • Often includes practical examples, sample test cases, and interview questions useful for job seekers
  • Simple, straightforward format that's easy to digest without needing extensive technical setup
  • Useful as a supplementary study resource alongside other QA learning platforms

Recommended for

  • Beginners entering the QA/software testing field looking for foundational knowledge
  • Job seekers preparing for manual testing interview questions
  • Students or self-learners who want free supplementary material on testing concepts
  • QA professionals needing a quick refresher on manual testing fundamentals
  • Those on a tight budget who can't afford premium testing courses or bootcamps

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GetSubmitList and ManualTesting.dev)

GetSubmitList

ManualTesting.dev

SEO
100 100%
SEO
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100
Backlink Monitoring
100 100%
Backlink Monitoring
0% 0
Test Management
0 0%
Test Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GetSubmitList and ManualTesting.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ManualTesting.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GetSubmitList mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GetSubmitList yet. Tracking of GetSubmitList recommendations started around Jun 2025.

ManualTesting.dev mentions (1)

  • How I improved my confidence, code quality and became a better developer
    We built ManualTesting.dev, a simple and powerful tool, to help my team and people like me write code, test it, and deliver on time with confidence. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GetSubmitList and ManualTesting.dev, you can also consider the following products

Backlink Tool - A backlink tool to index your links quickly and freely.

Backlink Monitor - Don't lose backlinks - Manage, monitor & get them indexed

Backlink Checker - Check and analyze any siteโ€™s backlinks

BackLink Patrol - A Unique Backlink Monitoring Tool

SEO PowerSuite Backlink API - On-demand backlink data for developers and agencies

Backlink List For StartUps - 133 great backlinks you can easily get for startups

Loading...