Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FTPloy VS ShellHub

Compare FTPloy VS ShellHub and see what are their differences

FTPloy logo FTPloy

Easy continuous deployment for everyone

ShellHub logo ShellHub

ShellHub enables teams to easily access any Linux device behind firewall and NAT
  • FTPloy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-27
  • ShellHub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-02

FTPloy features and specs

  • Automated Deployment
    FTPloy automates the deployment process directly from your Git repository, reducing the time and effort required for manual deployments.
  • Integration with Git Repositories
    It integrates seamlessly with popular Git platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket, allowing for a smooth deployment workflow from version control.
  • Easy to Use Interface
    FTPloy offers an intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to set up and manage deployments without requiring extensive technical knowledge.
  • Support for Multiple Environments
    You can deploy to multiple environments, such as development, staging, and production, making it flexible for different stages of your development cycle.
  • Notification System
    FTPloy provides notifications for deployment successes or failures, allowing teams to stay informed about the status of their deployments.

Possible disadvantages of FTPloy

  • Limited Hosting Options
    FTPloy primarily uses FTP for deployments, which may not be compatible with all types of hosting solutions that prefer more modern deployment methods.
  • Security Concerns
    FTP, being less secure than other protocols like SFTP or SSH, might expose your deployment to security vulnerabilities.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to more comprehensive CI/CD tools, FTPloy might lack advanced features that larger teams or projects might require, such as detailed build pipelines or complex automation scripts.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As an online service, FTPloy requires a stable internet connection for deployment operations, which could be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Potential for Errors with FTP
    Since FTP is used, there might be higher chances of encountering transfer errors or incomplete deployments, especially with large file sizes.

ShellHub features and specs

  • Centralized Management
    ShellHub offers centralized management for all your SSH devices, making it easier to manage multiple devices from a single interface.
  • Access Control
    With ShellHub, administrators can set up role-based access control, allowing for granular permissions and improved security over who can access which devices.
  • Web-based Terminal
    ShellHub provides a web-based terminal that allows users to access SSH devices through a browser, eliminating the need for a local SSH client.
  • Cloud and On-premises Deployment
    Users have the flexibility to deploy ShellHub in the cloud or on-premises, which can be tailored to their specific infrastructure needs and compliance requirements.
  • Audit Logging
    ShellHub includes audit logging features that help in tracking and monitoring user activity for better compliance and auditing purposes.

Possible disadvantages of ShellHub

  • Complexity for Small Networks
    For smaller networks or fewer devices, ShellHub might be overkill and introduce unnecessary complexity compared to simpler SSH management solutions.
  • Resource Intensive
    Deploying and running ShellHub can be resource-intensive, requiring sufficient hardware and potentially leading to higher operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may encounter a learning curve when initially setting up and configuring ShellHub, especially if they are new to centralized device management systems.
  • Dependency on Web Interface
    Relying on the web-based interface may be a disadvantage in environments where network reliability is an issue or where minimalist solutions are preferred.
  • Potential Security Risks
    As with any centralized management system, there is a potential risk that a compromised ShellHub deployment could lead to broader access issues across managed devices.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FTPloy and ShellHub)
Localhost Tools
56 56%
44% 44
Testing
54 54%
46% 46
Webhooks
50 50%
50% 50
Security
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using FTPloy and ShellHub. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ShellHub seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FTPloy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FTPloy yet. Tracking of FTPloy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ShellHub mentions (1)

  • Tutorial: How to access Raspberry Pi remotely from anywhere
    And we finished. Now You can access your RPI in an easy, fast, and safe way. If you have any doubts, feel free to check our documentation or contact us at contact@shellhub.io. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FTPloy and ShellHub, you can also consider the following products

Pisth - Pisth is an open source SSH and SFTP client for iOS.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Transmit iOS - Upload/download from a private server, website, or S3 in iOS

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Strongsync - Dropbox-like Sync and Backup using only SFTP or Amazon S3

Staqlab Tunnel - Expose server running on your localhost to internet and get a public domain which would work everywhere