FriendlyData VS Submarine Cable Map

• Ease of Use
  FriendlyData allows users to interact with databases using natural language queries, which makes it accessible for non-technical users who are not familiar with complex database query languages.
• Time-Saving
  By enabling natural language processing, FriendlyData reduces the time it takes for users to get the information they need, facilitating quicker decision-making processes.
• Integration
  FriendlyData can be integrated with various platforms and services, making it versatile for different business needs.

Possible disadvantages

• Complex Queries Limitation
  While FriendlyData is useful for simple queries, it may struggle to accurately interpret and execute more complex queries, limiting its effectiveness for advanced data analysis.
• Language Ambiguity
  Natural language processing might not always accurately interpret user queries, especially if the input is ambiguous or lacks specificity.
• Dependency on Vendor
  Relying on third-party services like FriendlyData introduces dependency on the vendor for maintenance, updates, and support, which could pose risks if the service changes or is discontinued.

• Comprehensive Data
  The map provides extensive information about submarine cables, including detailed routes, landing points, and cable owners, offering a broad view of global communication infrastructure.
• User-Friendly Interface
  It features an intuitive and interactive design that allows users to easily navigate the map and access detailed information with just a few clicks.
• Regular Updates
  The map is frequently updated to reflect new developments and changes in submarine cable deployments, ensuring users have access to current data.
• Educational Resource
  Its detailed visualization serves as an excellent educational tool for understanding global communications networks and the role of submarine cables.
• Free Access
  The tool is freely available to the public, providing valuable data to anyone interested in submarine cable infrastructure without any cost.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Granularity
  While the map presents comprehensive overviews, it may not provide the granular data needed for specialized analyses or operational planning.
• Potential for Outdated Information
  Despite regular updates, there's a possibility of outdated information due to the dynamic nature of underwater cable systems and delayed reporting.
• Requires Internet Connection
  Accessing the map necessitates an internet connection, which might not be available in remote areas or under certain field conditions.
• No Offline Version
  The absence of an offline version or downloadable dataset can be a limitation for users who need consistent access without relying on internet connectivity.
• Technical Understanding Required
  Users may require some level of technical knowledge to fully comprehend the data and implications of the submarine cables and their pathways.

Tracking FriendlyData since Mar 2021.

• SpaceX engineers in Fiji for six months (response to Tonga Volcano)

  According to the always-fun-to-look-at submarinecablemap.com, Fiji is connected to the Southern Cross Cable, and serves as the internet hub for the region. Source: over 4 years ago

• 25 min presentation why choose Google

  Anyway, the difference is - AWS leases single fiber pairs and rarely invests in cables while Google is known as the biggest cloud investor in subsea cables and owned (vs. leased) global infrastructure. According to submarinecablemap.com... Source: about 5 years ago