Fresh Framework Reviews

Netdata Reviews

Fresh Framework mentions (70)

• You're Doing Rails Wrong

  It's not so bad if you're doing it professionally because you pretty much set it up once and you're done. But yeah it's annoying for one-off projects or if web dev isn't your main job. That said you can avoid it. I wrote a website using Fresh (https://fresh.deno.dev/) and that was the only thing I needed. Incredibly simple compared to the usual Node/Webpack mess. Plus you're writing in Typescript, and can use TSX.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Deno 2.4

  I would highly recommend giving Deno Fresh[1] a go, it has a lot of the same features as Next.js but I find it to result in a much cleaner codebase overall. This coupled with Deno's built in KV store and hosted on Deploy makes for quite a zen workflow to be honest. [1]: https://fresh.deno.dev. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• FDLD - Fatigue Driven Lack of Development

  Ummm... Well I am mostly a web dev so I will try out the Fresh 🍋 framework to make something simple like an app where a user can log their mood (why not 🦀). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Let's talk metaframeworks

  Fresh. Deno-based full-stack web framework using…. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• 5 things I like about Deno

  Everything changed when I started "Tear Down and Rebuild" my blog. After many times of hesitating and pondering over technology choices, the name Fresh appeared. However, Fresh requires Deno as its runtime environment. Having no prior deployment experience but thinking "it's just a JavaScript runtime environment!" gave me more confidence. The next story is this article. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Netdata mentions (6)

• From Netdata Inspiration to SaaS MVP: Server Monitoring with Bun + Claude Code Opus 4.6

  If you've ever set up Netdata, you know that feeling — hundreds of real-time charts, per-second granularity, metrics you didn't even know your kernel exposed. It's a wonderful piece of software, genuinely one of the best open-source monitoring tools out there. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Trying to decide best practices for production environment

  Pros are instant HA and Migration. Cons are huge bandwidth hits. With your 4x1gbe you would be maxed out on replicating those 25 VMs. You wouldn't have anything for users. I have a test lab with 4 nodes, 22cpu 100gbram and 30tb space, using low end stuff, 12hdds. Proxmox, ceph dashboard, (the native ceph dashboard you can turn on), and a netdata.cloud account. So I watch it like a hawk and like to load test. Source: over 3 years ago

• Ask HN: Reducing the maintenance surface area of hosting a small internal app

  Docker-compose, not k8s. Set up a script to update the OS, pull all your containers and reboot after hours once a week or once a day. Make sure the script specifies non interactive. Set up alerting for low disk space, see https://netdata.cloud or use your own tool. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

• What’s your preferred stack?

  There can be some issues if you mix and match elastic versions, wazuh versions, logstash versions. But the documentation guides you very well with matrix of what is and is not compatible. You will want a beefy VM to run it in, I started smaller than I should of, and after running a while it kind of puked on itself, certain things would randomly stop working. After giving it 32GB RAM, plenty of disk 4TB, and 8... Source: almost 5 years ago

• Netdata on MacOS

  $ brew info netdata Netdata: stable 1.29.3 (bottled) Diagnose infrastructure problems with metrics, visualizations & alarms Https://netdata.cloud/ Not installed From: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/HEAD/Formula/netdata.rb License: GPL-3.0-or-later ==> Dependencies Build: autoconf ✘, automake ✘, pkg-config ✔ Required: json-c ✘, libuv ✘, lz4 ✘, openssl@1.1 ✔ ==> Caveats To start netdata: brew... Source: almost 5 years ago