Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

FreeMeter VS PingPlotter

Compare FreeMeter VS PingPlotter and see what are their differences

FreeMeter

Monitor network bandwidth (C#.NET 2k/XP+). Desktop and Systray graph.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
PingPlotter

PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Measure.sh
Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, PingPlotter seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 2
Monitoring Tools popularity
44% vs 56%
alternatives listed
53 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

FreeMeter
PingPlotter
Website miechu.pl pingman.com
Company Startup from Poland —
Listed in
Monitoring Tools Network Monitoring Cyber Security Firewall +1
SSH File Transfer Monitoring Tools OS & Utilities +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

FreeMeter 4 features
PingPlotter 5 features
  • Lightweight
    FreeMeter is a lightweight application, which means it does not consume significant system resources, making it suitable for older systems or those with limited resources.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application has a simple and intuitive interface, which makes it easy for users to monitor their system resources without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    FreeMeter provides real-time monitoring of system resources, allowing users to keep track of various metrics such as CPU usage, memory usage, and network activity.
  • Customizable Alerts
    The software allows users to set customizable alerts for different metrics, helping them to take timely actions when resource usage exceeds specified thresholds.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Feature Set
    FreeMeter lacks some of the more advanced features found in other monitoring tools, which may not satisfy users looking for in-depth analysis or comprehensive system management.
  • Windows Only
    The application is designed to run only on Windows systems, limiting its usability for users who operate on other operating systems like macOS or Linux.
  • Outdated Design
    The application interface may appear outdated, which might not be appealing to users who prefer modern design aesthetics.
  • No Active Development
    There is little evidence of active development or regular updates, which could lead to potential security vulnerabilities or compatibility issues with new Windows versions.
  • Detailed Network Diagnostics
    PingPlotter provides advanced network diagnostics by visualizing latency and packet loss over time, helping identify problematic areas in the network.
  • Historical Data
    The tool allows users to save and review historical data, which is invaluable for troubleshooting intermittent network issues that are not easily reproducible.
  • Ease of Use
    PingPlotter offers an easy-to-use interface that makes it accessible even for users who aren't network experts, allowing them to quickly start diagnosing issues.
  • Customizable Alerts
    Users can set up customizable alerts to notify them when latency or packet loss exceeds certain thresholds, providing timely insights into network performance issues.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    PingPlotter is available on Windows, Mac, and iOS, which offers flexibility for different types of users and environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    PingPlotter is not free, and the cost can be prohibitive for individuals or small businesses, especially for the Pro version which offers more advanced features.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running PingPlotter for extended periods can consume significant system resources, which might be a concern for users with lower-end hardware.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of PingPlotter has limited functionality, which may not be sufficient for diagnosing more complex network issues.
  • Learning Curve
    While the basic functions are user-friendly, some of the more advanced features and data interpretation can have a learning curve, requiring users to invest time to fully utilize the tool.
  • No Linux Support
    PingPlotter does not support Linux, which can be a drawback for network administrators working in a Linux-dominated environment.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

FreeMeter
PingPlotter

No analysis of FreeMeter yet.

Overall verdict

  • PingPlotter is generally regarded as a good choice for network monitoring and troubleshooting, especially for users who need detailed visibility into the performance and health of their network connections.

Why this product is good

  • PingPlotter is considered a reliable network monitoring tool because it provides detailed insights into network performance and helps identify the location and nature of connectivity issues. It offers a user-friendly interface with comprehensive graphical representations of network data, making it easier to diagnose problems. Additionally, it supports both live monitoring and historical data analysis, which is beneficial for ongoing network management.

Recommended for

    PingPlotter is recommended for IT professionals, network administrators, and any users who need to maintain network reliability and optimal performance. It is also suitable for remote workers experiencing connectivity issues and gamers who require low-latency connections.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

FreeMeter 0 videos + Add
PingPlotter 3 videos + Add

No FreeMeter videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Analyzing PingPlotter Data

More videos

  • - Use PingPlotter to identify poor QoS or intermittent connectivity issues.
  • - How to Use PingPlotter to Dignose Server Network Issues

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
FreeMeter
PingPlotter
44% 44%
Monitoring Tools
56% 56%
100% 100%
Exception Monitoring
0% 0%
0% 0%
SSH
100% 100%
100% 100%
Tool
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using FreeMeter and PingPlotter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

FreeMeter 0 mentions
PingPlotter 2 mentions

Tracking FreeMeter since Mar 2021.

  • Understanding missed attestations, understanding low effectiveness and improving your setup
    Once you have those in place, there is little more you can do to help. There might be some marginal benefits in connecting with more peers at the cost of higher resources usage, especially bandwidth. Under normal circumstances, the... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Packet Loss with PingPlotter
    I'm attempting to use PingPlotter to find the problem but I'm fairly new with it - The Packet Loss is occurring on IP 192.168.1.1 while testing 8.8.8.8, pingman.com, google.com, akamai.com however it does not show any PL for www.google.com. Source: almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to FreeMeter and PingPlotter

When comparing FreeMeter and PingPlotter, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...