Software Alternatives & Startups

Freelan VS CorsProxy.dev

Compare Freelan VS CorsProxy.dev and see what are their differences

Freelan

You are in control. Why would you trust a closed, proprietary software with your most-sensitive data ? Freelan is open-source and completely free. You know everything about its internals and its source-code.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
CorsProxy.dev

Managed CORS proxy with API keys, rate limits, and SSRF protection, or self-host the open-source Go runtime for free.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $5 / Monthly
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

VPN popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
149 vs 7

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Freelan
CorsProxy.dev
Website freelan.org corsproxy.dev
Pricing
Open source
Open source Freemium Free trial $5 / Monthly Official pricing
Company — Startup from The United Kingdom · 2026
Listed in

About Freelan and CorsProxy.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Freelan
CorsProxy.dev

No description of Freelan yet.

corsproxy.dev adds CORS headers to any API response so browser frontends can call third-party APIs directly, without building and running your own proxy. Hosted: Sign up, create an API key, start sending requests. Per-key rate limits, request logs, a dashboard, and a daily quota on the free plan,...

Read more about CorsProxy.dev

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Freelan 5 features
CorsProxy.dev 0 features
  • Open Source
    Freelan is open-source software, which means its source code is freely available for anyone to view, modify, and distribute. This enhances transparency and allows for community-driven improvements.
  • Cross-Platform
    Freelan supports multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for different users.
  • Security
    Freelan utilizes strong encryption protocols to ensure secure communications over the network, safeguarding data from potential breaches.
  • Customizable
    Users can customize their network configurations to meet specific requirements, thanks to its flexible and extensible architecture.
  • No Central Servers
    Freelan operates on a peer-to-peer architecture, eliminating the need for central servers and reducing points of failure.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up Freelan can be complex for non-technical users, requiring some understanding of network configurations and command-line operations.
  • Limited Documentation
    Although there is some documentation available, it is not as comprehensive as that for some competing solutions, making it harder for new users to get started.
  • Smaller Community
    Being a less popular option, Freelan has a smaller user community, which might result in fewer resources, tutorials, and community support compared to more mainstream solutions.
  • Performance Overheads
    As with many VPN solutions, Freelan can introduce latency and reduced network performance, particularly if not configured optimally.
  • Lack of GUI
    Freelan does not have a graphical user interface (GUI), making it less user-friendly and more challenging for users who prefer not to work with command-line tools.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Freelan
CorsProxy.dev

Overall verdict

  • Freelan is considered a good choice for users who need a customizable and open-source VPN solution. It is reliable, secure, and caters to users who prefer to have control over their network settings.

Why this product is good

  • Freelan is an open-source virtual private network (VPN) software that enables users to create secure private networks. It is highly configurable, supports various network topologies, and ensures privacy and security through encryption. Users appreciate its flexibility and the freedom it provides in terms of network configuration, making it a good choice for those who want more control over their networking setup.

Recommended for

  • Users who want an open-source VPN solution
  • Individuals with technical expertise who can manage network configurations
  • Those who prioritize security and privacy
  • Anyone looking to set up custom VPN topologies

No analysis of CorsProxy.dev yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Freelan
CorsProxy.dev
100% 100%
VPN
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Freelan and CorsProxy.dev.

What makes your product unique?

CorsProxy.dev's answer:

It's a managed CORS proxy that blocks requests to private IPs, loopback, and cloud metadata endpoints (SSRF protection) by default — most CORS proxies don't do this at all, hosted or self-hosted. The hosted API and the self-hosted binary run the same open-source Go core, so you can start on the free managed tier and move to self-hosting later without changing how you call it. It also runs a remote MCP server, so AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor) can call third-party APIs through your key without ever seeing the upstream secret.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CorsProxy.dev's answer:

Most free CORS proxies (corsproxy.io, allorigins, cors-anywhere) are unmanaged public relays with no auth, no logs, and no SSRF protection — fine for a demo, risky for production. CorsProxy.dev gives you per-key auth, rate limits, request logs, and a dashboard on a free tier, plus an open-source self-host path (MIT) if you'd rather not depend on a hosted service at all.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

CorsProxy.dev's answer:

Go (self-hosted / open-source core), TypeScript on Cloudflare Workers (hosted SaaS), Cloudflare KV, D1, and Durable Objects for rate limiting.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

CorsProxy.dev's answer:

Frontend and full-stack developers who need their browser app to call a third-party API that doesn't send CORS headers — indie hackers and small teams shipping fast without standing up a backend just to proxy one API call, plus developers wiring AI agents up to external APIs.

User comments

Share your experience with using Freelan and CorsProxy.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Freelan no reviews yet
CorsProxy.dev no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of CorsProxy.dev yet. Be the first one to post

Alternatives to Freelan and CorsProxy.dev

When comparing Freelan and CorsProxy.dev, you can also consider the following products.