
Meetup
dateit
Expose
Packetriot
UrlEdge
ngrok
LocalXpose
Create privacy-focused shortened URLs

accessiBe
Wave
Siteimprove
UserWay
ScreenMySite
Axessibly
axe DevTools
Get a real WCAG accessibility grade in 30 seconds. No widget, no snake oil. Built for the EU Accessibility Act & ADA.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | fwd.so | trueconform.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Forward yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Take a Virtual Tour of Forward
More videos
No TrueConform videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Forward and TrueConform.
TrueConform's answer:
Headless Chromium for real-page rendering, the open-source axe-core engine (Deque) for WCAG testing, and a severity-weighted scoring model shared across the web scanner, Chrome extension, and PDF reports.
TrueConform's answer:
Most accessibility vendors sell overlay widgets that studies and lawsuits have shown don't fix real barriers — and can add legal risk. TrueConform tells you the truth: a real scan, a defensible grade, per-issue WCAG references, and fixes your own developer can apply. Free to scan, transparent pricing, no lock-in, no snake oil.
TrueConform's answer:
TrueConform is audit-first, not overlay-first. It runs the real axe-core engine against WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA and returns an honest, severity-weighted grade with plain-English fixes. It deliberately refuses to sell a "one-line script makes you compliant" widget or a fake certification badge — because courts and regulators judge whether real users can use your site, not whether a widget is installed.
TrueConform's answer:
Small and mid-sized e-commerce sites and the agencies/developers who serve them — in the EU and anywhere the ADA applies — who need to meet the European Accessibility Act without buying an overlay or paying enterprise audit prices.
TrueConform's answer:
TrueConform was built by Pilotmain after watching the accessibility market fill up with overlay widgets that promise instant compliance and deliver neither. We wanted an honest scanner: real testing, honest grades, and clear fixes — the accessibility tool we'd actually want pointed at our own sites.
TrueConform's answer:
Leave this one blank. You don't have customers to name yet, and inventing any would violate your own honesty positioning. Skip it — an empty answer is far better than a fake one.
Share your experience with using Forward and TrueConform. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing Forward and TrueConform, you can also consider the following products.

Helps groups of people with shared interests plan events and facilitates off line group meetings in various localities around the world.
Compare Meetup to Forward or TrueConform:

Making websites accessible to people with disabilities
Compare accessiBe to Forward or TrueConform:


Mobile money, reinvented. Deposit, withdraw, pay bills for free. Send for only 1%.
Compare Wave to Forward or TrueConform:

A beautiful, open-source, tunneling service - written in PHP
Compare Expose to Forward or TrueConform:

Consider the Siteimprove Intelligence Platform the newest member of your team.
Compare Siteimprove to Forward or TrueConform: