Software Alternatives & Startups

foobar2000 VS Violentmonkey

Compare foobar2000 VS Violentmonkey and see what are their differences

foobar2000

An advanced freeware audio player for the Windows platform.

Rating
0 reviews
Violentmonkey

Violentmonkey is a userscript manager to support running userscripts in web pages.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Violentmonkey seems to be a lot more popular than foobar2000. While we know about 46 links to Violentmonkey, we've tracked only 3 mentions of foobar2000.

social mentions
3 vs 46
Music Player popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 30

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

foobar2000
Violentmonkey
Website foobar2000.org violentmonkey.github.io
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

foobar2000 5 features
Violentmonkey 5 features
  • High Customizability
    Foobar2000 allows for extensive customization through themes, plugins, and advanced settings, enabling users to tailor the interface and functionality to their specific needs.
  • Wide Format Support
    The player supports a broad range of audio formats including MP3, AAC, WMA, FLAC, WAV, and many others, ensuring compatibility with most audio files.
  • Lightweight and Efficient
    Foobar2000 is designed to be lightweight and efficient, consuming minimal system resources, which makes it a good choice for users with less powerful hardware.
  • Advanced Features
    The player includes advanced features such as gapless playback, ReplayGain, and customizable keyboard shortcuts, catering to power users and audiophiles.
  • Active Development and Community
    Foobar2000 has a strong, active development team and community, providing regular updates and a wealth of user-created plugins and themes.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find the interface and extensive customization options overwhelming, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Basic Default Interface
    The default interface is quite plain and may not be visually appealing to users seeking a more modern or advanced look without additional customization.
  • Limited Native Features
    While highly customizable through plugins, the out-of-the-box functionality may be limited compared to some other media players, requiring users to invest time in finding and installing plugins.
  • Windows-Centric
    Foobar2000 is primarily designed for Windows, with macOS and mobile versions lacking some of the advanced features available on the Windows platform.
  • No Built-in Streaming Services
    Unlike some modern media players, Foobar2000 does not natively support popular streaming services, which might be a drawback for users looking to integrate streaming within their media player.
  • Free and Open Source
    Violentmonkey is freely available to use and the source code is open for anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to. This ensures transparency and community-driven development.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained and updated, which means that bugs are fixed promptly and new features are regularly added.
  • Cross-Browser Support
    Violentmonkey is compatible with multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Opera, providing flexibility to users regardless of their browser preference.
  • User Script Manager
    It allows users to manage and run custom scripts to enhance web pages, providing extensive customization options for a tailored browsing experience.
  • Easy Backup and Sync
    Features like backup and sync allow users to easily transfer their settings and scripts across different devices, ensuring a consistent experience.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    For new users, especially those not familiar with scripting, there might be a learning curve involved in understanding how to write and manage scripts effectively.
  • Security Risks
    As with any tool that runs third-party scripts, there is a potential risk for malicious scripts that can compromise user security and privacy if not properly vetted.
  • Dependency on Community Scripts
    The quality and functionality of Violentmonkey heavily rely on the availability and maintenance of user-submitted scripts, which can vary in quality.
  • Browser Performance Impact
    Running multiple or poorly optimized scripts can affect browser performance by increasing loading times and resource consumption.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

foobar2000
Violentmonkey

Overall verdict

  • Yes, foobar2000 is a good media player.

Why this product is good

  • foobar2000 is highly regarded for its lightweight and customizable nature. It supports a wide range of audio formats and offers advanced tagging capabilities. Its open component architecture allows for extensive customization and functionality extensions, making it a favorite among audiophiles and users who value performance and flexibility.

Recommended for

  • Users who need a lightweight and efficient audio player
  • Audiophiles looking for advanced audio processing and output options
  • Individuals who enjoy customizing their software experience
  • Anyone requiring support for a wide variety of audio formats
  • Users interested in using plugins to extend functionality

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Violentmonkey is a reliable and efficient userscript manager that caters to the needs of users who want to customize their web browsing experience.

Why this product is good

  • Violentmonkey is considered a good choice for users looking to manage userscripts on their web browsers. It provides a clean and straightforward interface, supports a wide range of script sources, and is compatible with multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge. Moreover, it is open-source, allowing for community contributions and transparency.

Recommended for

  • Tech-savvy users interested in enhancing their web browser functionality through userscripts.
  • Developers who want to test userscripts in a flexible environment.
  • Users looking for an open-source alternative to other popular script managers like Greasemonkey or Tampermonkey.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

foobar2000 2 videos + Add
Violentmonkey 1 video + Add

Z Review - My Foobar2000 Setup Video

More videos

  • - Foobar2000 - The Best Music Player

暴力猴 Violentmonkey chrome 神器扩展插件 看VIP电影 下载视频一应俱全

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
foobar2000
Violentmonkey
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using foobar2000 and Violentmonkey. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

foobar2000 no reviews yet
Violentmonkey no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Violentmonkey yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

foobar2000 3 mentions
Violentmonkey 46 mentions
  • For those who've recently switched from Windows to Mac, what's the one app you miss the most?
    Foobar2000. There is no macOS music player that comes close; QuodLibet almost hits the spot, but that's a very large "almost". Source: over 3 years ago
  • Girl with blow up costume really whips the llama's ass
    Putting WinAmp nostalgia aside, have you heard of https://foobar2000.org? Source: almost 4 years ago
  • This man thought opening a TXT file is fine, he thought wrong
    I would 100% agree if it weren't for the existence of the music player foobar2000. Both share similar design goals. But foobar takes it a step further by making the entire UI completely user customizable with a simple built in editor.... Source: over 5 years ago
  • Show HN: UserScript to manually choose model for ChatGPT website
    - GPT 4o mini, so you can save your 4o calls for more complex queries https://github.com/altbdoor/userscripts/raw/master/force-gpt3.user.js. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • If your Firefox suddenly started to hang or become extremely slow today, check if you have tampermonkey 5.0. Disable it for now as it seems to be the culprit.
    Since Tampermonkey seems to be misbehaving, consider using Violentmonkey. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Current plan for the flag
    Step 1Install violentmonkey (or your favorite user script manager). Source: about 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to foobar2000 and Violentmonkey

When comparing foobar2000 and Violentmonkey, you can also consider the following products.