
Logseq
Obsidian
Zim Wiki
Nuclino
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

Acronis True Image
Duplicati
Clonezilla
Macrium Reflect
CrashPlan
rsync
Backblaze
Time Machine is the breakthrough automatic backup that’s built right into Mac OS X.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Foam seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | foambubble.github.io | support.apple.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Time Machine is recommended for Mac users who want an uncomplicated, built-in backup solution. It's especially beneficial for those who value automatic backups and seamless data restoration without needing third-party software.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
Bad Movie Beatdown: The Time Machine (2002) (REVIEW)
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Foam and Time Machine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Tracking Time Machine since Mar 2021.
When comparing Foam and Time Machine, you can also consider the following products.

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to Foam or Time Machine:

(Formerly Acronis True Image) Complete protection for your digital life
Compare Acronis True Image to Foam or Time Machine:

A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to Foam or Time Machine:

Free backup software to store backups online with strong encryption. Works with FTP, SSH, WebDAV, OneDrive, Amazon S3, Google Drive and many others.
Compare Duplicati to Foam or Time Machine:

Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.
Compare Zim Wiki to Foam or Time Machine:

Clonezilla is a suite of software that's designed to allow you to back-up and image new hard drives with your data.
Compare Clonezilla to Foam or Time Machine: