
Logseq
Obsidian
Zim Wiki
Nuclino
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

Sitecake
ClassicPress
TYPO3
Anchor CMS
Flextype
ApostropheCMS
Microweber
Textpattern is an elegant content management system that is free, open source software.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Foam should be more popular than Textpattern. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | foambubble.github.io | textpattern.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United States | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
Textpattern CMS Tutorial 1 install on local server
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Foam and Textpattern. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Foam yet. Be the first one to post
If you are looking for a simple, text-based, straightforward CMS, then TextPattern is the one you are looking for. TextPattern, focused mainly on your text content, is a great CMS option for bloggers and independent...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
There's always https://textpattern.com/ which is also as old as Wordpress (older?) and better coded. (See also thttps://textpattern.org/ ). - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
For former MoveableType fans missing "the good old days" of CMS before headless CMS and the JAMstack took over the world, do take a look at: https://textpattern.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
There's ClassicPress. But a better alternative than sticking with WP is https://textpattern.com/ (which has better and more stable codebase that is as old as WordPress). - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
When comparing Foam and Textpattern, you can also consider the following products.

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to Foam or Textpattern:

Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.
Compare Sitecake to Foam or Textpattern:

A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to Foam or Textpattern:

The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!
Compare ClassicPress to Foam or Textpattern:

Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.
Compare Zim Wiki to Foam or Textpattern:

TYPO3.com - Infos, SLAs, Extended Support Versions and more
Compare TYPO3 to Foam or Textpattern: