
Logseq
Obsidian
Nuclino
Zim Wiki
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

GitHub
GitLab
BitBucket
openDesktop.org
Gitea
Launchpad.net
OSOR
The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Foam seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | foambubble.github.io | sourceforge.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Foam and SourceForge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Foam yet. Be the first one to post
SourceForge is a great place for people who like open-source software. It offers a strong platform where you can find, review, and handle software, all while helping the open-source community.
SourceForge’s user interface works fine, but it could do with a modern overhaul to make it easier on the eye and give it a more intuitive feel. While it has a large community, SourceForge’s support is not as extensive...
Sourceforge has been around longer than most, and it has the projects to prove it. Lots of open source Linux, Windows and Mac projects are hosted on SF. It has a totally different project structure when compared with...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Tracking SourceForge since Mar 2021.
When comparing Foam and SourceForge, you can also consider the following products.

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to Foam or SourceForge:

Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to Foam or SourceForge:

A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to Foam or SourceForge:

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to Foam or SourceForge:

Nuclino works like a collective brain, helping teams bring all their knowledge, docs, and projects together in one place. It's a modern, simple, and blazingly fast way to collaborate.
Compare Nuclino to Foam or SourceForge:

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to Foam or SourceForge: