
Logseq
Obsidian
Zim Wiki
Nuclino
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

Codase
IT Wordsearch Labs
Sourcegraph
grep.app
Snip2Code.com
bloop
Productivity Power Tools
A source code search engine
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Foam should be more popular than searchcode. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | foambubble.github.io | searchcode.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of searchcode yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
No searchcode videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Foam and searchcode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Been working on https://searchcode.com/ again which I bought back, albeit as code search tool for LLMs. It solves the “should I use this library” by allowing the LLM to inspect search and analyse it before integration. Can use it to... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
I reimagined https://searchcode.com/ since I realised LLMs have issues when it comes to understanding code you want to integrate. It’s useful for looking though any codebase, or multiple without having to clone it. I use it when I have... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Searchcode doesn't seem to work for me. All queries (even the ones recommended by the site) unfortunately return zero results. Maybe it got hugged? https://searchcode.com/?q=re.compile+lang%3Apython. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
When comparing Foam and searchcode, you can also consider the following products.

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to Foam or searchcode:

Codase is the leading source code search company with advanced source code understanding and xml...
Compare Codase to Foam or searchcode:

A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to Foam or searchcode:

Master programming terminology with IT Wordsearch. Multiple game modes, 10+ categories, and daily challenges.
Compare IT Wordsearch Labs to Foam or searchcode:

Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.
Compare Zim Wiki to Foam or searchcode:
