
Logseq
Obsidian
Zim Wiki
Nuclino
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

ML5.js
Spell
Lobe
ML Showcase
Apple Machine Learning Journal
Amazon Machine Learning
Machine Learning Playground
The latest in machine learning at your fingerprints

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Papers with Code should be more popular than Foam. It has been mentioned 100 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | foambubble.github.io | paperswithcode.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Papers with Code yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
The best site for research papers with codes on Machine/Deep Learning | Research paper search
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Foam and Papers with Code. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Benchmark Primary focus Evaluation metrics System coverage Usability Link HumaneBench AI benchmark Human well being, humane AI principles HumaneScore, flip tests under adversarial instruction, long term well being 15 popular chat... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
An helpful approach is to browse the state of the art models in paperswithcode. This will give you an idea of the performance of different models on various tasks. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
I think a way around this would some sort of voting/ popularity system? Papers with code (https://paperswithcode.com/) does this via Github stars sorting. Sure it doesn't mean something is established. But it at least gives some... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
When comparing Foam and Papers with Code, you can also consider the following products.

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to Foam or Papers with Code:


A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to Foam or Papers with Code:


Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.
Compare Zim Wiki to Foam or Papers with Code:
