
Logseq
Obsidian
Zim Wiki
Nuclino
Trilium Notes
TiddlyWiki
Roam Research
Personal knowledge management and sharing on VSCode & GitHub

Quill
ProseMirror
Next.js
Trix
MediumEditor
React
Froala Editor
Rich Text Editor Framework for React

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Foam should be more popular than Draft.js. It has been mentioned 49 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | foambubble.github.io | draftjs.org |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States | — |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Draft.js yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
These panels DESTROYED my STUDIO....REVERB? - ArrowZoom Foam Review
More videos
Live coding – Draft.js copy-paste fix
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Foam and Draft.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
I've been using foam instead of obsidian for my personal knowledge base. It works rather well. And it's completely free and ultimately just markdown. While I might wish it was djot, I don't wish hard enough to make that so myself... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I gave up on Obsidian and just use Foam (https://foambubble.github.io/foam/) and/or vimwiki. I just can’t get into overwrought, arbitrarily designed organization schemes or proprietary apps (Foam-managed content is just plain Markdown,... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Therefore, we wanted to choose a low-level framework that would solve most of the issues related to text input. We settled on Draft.js, which was quite popular at the time (2020). All we had to do was integrate it into our current... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Are you looking for a lightweight, flexible, and modern rich text editor for your React applications? Look no further! I'm excited to share react-rte-light, a TypeScript-based rich text editor built with Draft.js. It’s designed to work... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lexical is an open source project and considered the successor of Draft.js. It is primarily developed by Meta, licensed under MIT. It is not restricted to React, but supports Vanilla JS, too. The flexibility enables us to integrate it... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
When comparing Foam and Draft.js, you can also consider the following products.

Logseq is a local-first, non-linear, outliner notebook for organizing and sharing your personal knowledge base.
Compare Logseq to Foam or Draft.js:


A second brain, for you, forever. Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files.
Compare Obsidian to Foam or Draft.js:

A toolkit for building rich-text editors on the web
Compare ProseMirror to Foam or Draft.js:

Zim is a graphical text editor used to maintain a collection of wiki pages. Each page can contain links to other pages, simple formatting and images.
Compare Zim Wiki to Foam or Draft.js:

A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Compare Next.js to Foam or Draft.js: