
Openbox
IceWM
i3
awesome
dwm
Compiz
pekwm
Fluxbox is a window manager for X that was based on the Blackbox 0.61.1 code.

Modal
e2b
Herdr
Tensorlake
Codesphere
AppWizzy
InstaVM
Close your laptop again: run Claude Code and Codex in the cloud

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Fluxbox should be more popular than Boxes.dev. It has been mentioned 8 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | fluxbox.org | boxes.dev |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Fluxbox yet.
Boxes.dev is a cloud development environment for building software with coding agents. It looks like the Codex or Claude desktop apps, but works a bit differently: Everything is in the cloud, so you can close your laptop and nothing stops. Pick up the same sessions from the iOS and Android apps,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Openbox, Fluxbox or JWM which one do you like?
More videos
No Boxes.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Fluxbox and Boxes.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


In 2008 I started using a netbook, an ASUS Eee PC and since RAM was scarse I had to find a better way to provide myself access to tools, so I discovered and fell in love with fluxbox. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
> My journey with FreeBSD began with version 4.5 or 4.6, running in VMware on Windows and using XDMCP for the desktop. It was super fast and ran at almost native speed. Wow, this brings back some memories. I remember being on a gig... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
I have been using fluxbox[1] for many years now, happily. It's a very barebones thing (in a good way) while also being highly configurable — customizable keyboard shortcuts, menus, scriptability, etc. It is not a tiling WM. It... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
(disclosure: I'm a founder of yet another T3/Conductor competitor, https://boxes.dev) You might want to do a quick eval of all the products in the space vs your org's needs! There are a lot of options now,... - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
We built https://boxes.dev specifically for cloud dev / isolated VMs (disclosure, I'm one of the founders). Getting work off your laptop is such a productivity boost when you have parallel threads.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
Tried Conductor in the past but had migrated all of our teams remote development work to http://boxes.dev as it was much more intuitive and easier to manage parallel workstreams. Would highly recommend it... - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
When comparing Fluxbox and Boxes.dev, you can also consider the following products.
Openbox is a highly configurable, next generation window manager with extensive standards support.
Compare Openbox to Fluxbox or Boxes.dev:


icewm home page . Bug Tracking. If you have a patch, a bug report or a feature request to submit, please do so at the icewm project page at SourceForge.
Compare IceWM to Fluxbox or Boxes.dev:


A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.
Compare i3 to Fluxbox or Boxes.dev:

To coding agents what tmux is to terminals. Runs where your agents run: close the laptop, ssh from anywhere, nothing dies.
Compare Herdr to Fluxbox or Boxes.dev: