Fluper Reviews

1. Zainab Rashid

   · COO at ClickMyLoan · about 2 years ago
   Our company offers a cutting-edge mobile banking app, connecting customers with secure and convenient digital banking services.

   In collaboration with Fluper, our primary objective was to develop a user-friendly mobile banking app, allowing customers to manage accounts, make payments, and access financial information. Key deliverables included a seamless user interface, robust security features, and real-time transaction tracking.

   🏁 Competitors: Chime

   👍 Pros:    What truly impressed us about fluper was their commitment to ensuring top-tier security for the mobile banking app. they seamlessly integrated advanced security measures and compliance with banking regulations, providing customers with a secure and convenient digital banking experience.

   👎 Cons:    Fluper was largely positive for us. they played a pivotal role in enhancing post-launch support, providing excellent financial analytics, and ensuring the long-term success of our mobile banking app.
2. Eslam Tawakol

   · QA Manager at Flipdish · about 2 years ago
   Our company offers a comprehensive restaurant management platform, connecting restaurant owners with tools for reservation management, order processing, and customer engagement.

   In collaboration with Fluper, our primary goal was to create a user-friendly restaurant management software that allowed owners to streamline reservations, process orders, and interact with customers. Key deliverables included a responsive interface, secure data storage, and real-time performance analytics.

   🏁 Competitors: JustFoodERP, Foodservice Suite

   👍 Pros:    What truly impressed us about fluper was their deep understanding of the restaurant industry's intricacies. they seamlessly integrated features that enhanced table management and customer interactions while ensuring data security and compliance with industry standards.

   👎 Cons:    Fluper exceeded our expectations. they played a crucial role in enhancing post-launch support, providing excellent restaurant analytics, and ensuring the long-term success of our restaurant management platform.
3. Levi Hernandez

   · COO at Momentus Technologies · about 2 years ago
   Our company provides a comprehensive event management platform, connecting event organizers with tools to plan, promote, and execute successful events.

   Partnering with Fluper, our goal was to develop an event management software that offered features for event planning, ticketing, and attendee engagement. Key deliverables included a user-friendly event dashboard, secure payment processing, and real-time analytics.

   🏁 Competitors: Event Management Technology

   👍 Pros:    What truly set fluper apart was their deep understanding of the event industry's intricacies. they seamlessly integrated features that streamlined event planning and promotion while ensuring data security and compliance with industry standards.

   👎 Cons:    Fluper exceeded our expectations. they played a pivotal role in enhancing post-launch support, providing exceptional event analytics, and helping us transform our event management capabilities.

runc Reviews

Fluper mentions (0)

runc mentions (11)

• Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm

  For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers

  Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning

  Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products

  It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• Why did the Krustlet project die?

  Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 3 years ago