
Flightcontrol.dev
Appliku
Netlify
Pulumi
DigitalOcean
Railway
Vercel
Zeabur
Packer
Terraform
Puppet Enterprise
Rancher
Red Hat OpenShift
HHVM
RunDeck
Juju
Flightcontrol.devNo features have been listed yet.
Based on our record, Packer should be more popular than Flightcontrol.dev. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Since DHH has been promoting the 'do-it-yourself' approach, many people have fallen for it. You're asking the right questions that only a few people know they need answers to. In my opinion, the closest thing to "reclaiming the stack" while still being a PaaS is to use a "deploy to your cloud account" PaaS provider. These services offer the convenience of a PaaS provider, yet allow you to "eject" to using the... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Flightcontrol.dev - Deploy web services, databases, and more on your own AWS account with a Git push style workflow. Free tier for users with 1 developer on personal GitHub repos. AWS costs are billed through AWS, but you can use credits and the AWS free tier. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Have you seen https://www.flightcontrol.dev/? It might help you out with that infrastructure issue with the ease of PaaS! Source: over 3 years ago
Flightcontrol.dev is also pretty interesting if for some reason you want to deploy directly on AWS. Source: almost 4 years ago
Flightcontrol.dev is what you're looking for. Source: about 4 years ago
If you have just upgraded to Ubuntu 22.04, and you suddenly experience either errors when trying to ssh into hosts, or when running ansible or again when running the ansible provisioner building a packer image, this is probably going to be useful for you. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
I am already using Hashicorp Packer at work and for personal projects and I wanted to test This idea out by wrapping it a single Packer Template file. This reduces the level of maintaining a lot of small scripts, Dockerfiles and configurations and the user can simply trigger a couple of Commands to get a minimalist OS at the end of the process. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
And while it is a slight increase in complexity, it can be an overall net gain in functionality, configurability and reliability. Much like Packer is far more reliable and practical than manually making VM images sitting in front of a terminal, even though making the initial configuration takes some time. Source: almost 4 years ago
Hashicorp Packer provides a nice wrapper / abstraction over the QEMU in order to boot the image and use it to set it up on first-boot. Instead of writing really long commands in order to boot up the image using QEMU, Packer provided a nice Configuration Template in a more Readable fashion. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Packer seemed like the perfect tool for the job. I have never used it before and wanted to get familiar with the tool. It doesn't come with ARM support out of the box, but there are two community projects to fill that niche. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Appliku - Deploy Django and Python apps on servers you own. We manage the servers, you just push code.
Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.
Pulumi - Cloud Infrastructure for any cloud using languages you already know and love.
Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service