Software Alternatives & Reviews

Flent VS mtr

Compare Flent VS mtr and see what are their differences

Flent logo Flent

The FLExible Network Tester

mtr logo mtr

mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...
  • Flent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-07
  • mtr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22

Flent videos

Flent b091 unboxing & review

mtr videos

35" Goodyear MTR Tire Review | Jeep TJ

More videos:

  • Review - Exploring Traditions & Tasting the VEGETARIAN LUNCH THALI At Mavalli Tiffin Rooms | MTR | Bangalore
  • Review - CZ MTR 457 MATCH .22LR first impressions review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flent and mtr)
Monitoring Tools
40 40%
60% 60
IP Data
0 0%
100% 100
Network & Admin
38 38%
62% 62
Log Management
40 40%
60% 60

User comments

Share your experience with using Flent and mtr. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flent should be more popular than mtr. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flent mentions (7)

  • Most accurate internet speed test.
    You should try Flent from the BufferBloat project. Source: 11 months ago
  • Tools for measuring Network convergence, delay and packet loss
    Flent (Flexible Network Tester) is a powerful network testing utility that aims to simplify the process of gathering and analyzing network performance metrics. Built on top of other open-source tools like Netperf, Iperf, and Ping, Flent automates the process of running multiple tests simultaneously and aggregates the results into comprehensive, easy-to-interpret graphs. Flent's ability to run various tests in... Source: about 1 year ago
  • Help eliminating buffer bloat on connection speeds over 1gbps
    Hmm... It does not take much packet loss to slow tcp down at that rate. A better test would run longer than waveform, like the flent.org tcp_ndown test. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Loaded latency with fast.com?
    Also most of our web based tests do not last long enough to show the full extent of the problem. Waveform, while pretty good, doesn't test up and down simultaneously, nor does it last long enough. I've put out a few measurements here or there about what Starlink looks like over time, such as most recently, over here: https://github.com/mininet/mininet/issues/1119 - long term spikes for "Working latency" on... Source: about 2 years ago
  • 6.6 is out
    Install Flent. See the bottom of https://flent.org/ for instructions. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

mtr mentions (1)

  • Show HN: How did YOUR computer reach my server?
    Interesting, I didn't know traceroute used UDP by default. Just did some testing with the best traceroute tool, mtr[0], and using the -u flag for UDP seemed to give the worst results. -t for TCP seemed OK. I never thought about the difference between how TCP and ICMP packets are handled. [0] https://bitwizard.nl/mtr/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flent and mtr, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

ifconfig.co - What is my IP address? — The best tool to find your own IP address, and information about it.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

ipinfo.io - Simple IP address information.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.