Software Alternatives & Reviews

Flent VS TamoSoft Throughput Test

Compare Flent VS TamoSoft Throughput Test and see what are their differences

Flent logo Flent

The FLExible Network Tester

TamoSoft Throughput Test logo TamoSoft Throughput Test

TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.
  • Flent Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-07
  • TamoSoft Throughput Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-27

Flent videos

Flent b091 unboxing & review

TamoSoft Throughput Test videos

No TamoSoft Throughput Test videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flent and TamoSoft Throughput Test)
Monitoring Tools
41 41%
59% 59
Network & Admin
41 41%
59% 59
Log Management
42 42%
58% 58
Tool
46 46%
54% 54

User comments

Share your experience with using Flent and TamoSoft Throughput Test. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flent seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flent mentions (7)

  • Most accurate internet speed test.
    You should try Flent from the BufferBloat project. Source: 11 months ago
  • Tools for measuring Network convergence, delay and packet loss
    Flent (Flexible Network Tester) is a powerful network testing utility that aims to simplify the process of gathering and analyzing network performance metrics. Built on top of other open-source tools like Netperf, Iperf, and Ping, Flent automates the process of running multiple tests simultaneously and aggregates the results into comprehensive, easy-to-interpret graphs. Flent's ability to run various tests in... Source: about 1 year ago
  • Help eliminating buffer bloat on connection speeds over 1gbps
    Hmm... It does not take much packet loss to slow tcp down at that rate. A better test would run longer than waveform, like the flent.org tcp_ndown test. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Loaded latency with fast.com?
    Also most of our web based tests do not last long enough to show the full extent of the problem. Waveform, while pretty good, doesn't test up and down simultaneously, nor does it last long enough. I've put out a few measurements here or there about what Starlink looks like over time, such as most recently, over here: https://github.com/mininet/mininet/issues/1119 - long term spikes for "Working latency" on... Source: about 2 years ago
  • 6.6 is out
    Install Flent. See the bottom of https://flent.org/ for instructions. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

TamoSoft Throughput Test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TamoSoft Throughput Test yet. Tracking of TamoSoft Throughput Test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flent and TamoSoft Throughput Test, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

NetStress - NetStress is a user-friendly benchmarking tool that is mostly used by networking professionals to measure the network performance of both wired and wireless connections.

nuttcp - nuttcp is another network test tool, similar to iperf2 and iperf3, that has a number of unique features.

goben - goben is a tool to measure TCP/UDP transport layer throughput between hosts.