Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

mtr VS netperf

Compare mtr VS netperf and see what are their differences

mtr logo mtr

mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

netperf logo netperf

Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...
  • mtr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22
  • netperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-07

mtr features and specs

  • Real-time Network Diagnostics
    MTR (My Traceroute) provides real-time statistics on the network path, including packet loss and latency, which helps in diagnosing network issues promptly.
  • Combination of Ping and Traceroute
    MTR combines the functionalities of both ping and traceroute, allowing for comprehensive analysis by showing the route and performance metrics for each hop along the path.
  • Continuous Monitoring
    Unlike traditional traceroute that runs once, MTR continuously sends packets, providing ongoing updates on the network status, which helps in identifying intermittent issues.
  • Visualization Options
    MTR includes both console-based and GUI-based interfaces, catering to different user preferences and making it easier to visualize the network performance.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    MTR is available on multiple operating systems including Linux, BSD variants, and macOS, ensuring that it can be used in various environments.

Possible disadvantages of mtr

  • Potential Overhead
    Continuous monitoring by MTR can add network overhead, especially in congested networks, possibly impacting performance.
  • Security Concerns
    Using MTR might pose security risks, as it continuously sends packets to remote hosts. This can be exploited to perform network reconnaissance or be flagged by security systems.
  • Requires Administrative Privileges
    Running MTR typically requires administrative or root privileges, which may not be available in all environments or may pose security risks if improperly managed.
  • Limited Network Layer Support
    MTR primarily functions at the IP layer and might not provide insights into application-specific issues or issues at different OSI layers, limiting its diagnostic capabilities for complex problems.
  • Dependency on External Conditions
    The accuracy and usefulness of MTR reports can be affected by variables like network congestion, traffic shaping, and firewall rules, which can lead to misleading conclusions about network health.

netperf features and specs

  • Comprehensive Performance Testing
    Netperf is a versatile benchmarking tool that provides a robust suite of tests for evaluating various aspects of network performance, such as throughput, latency, and transaction rates. This allows users to gain a detailed understanding of network performance under different conditions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    The tool supports a range of protocols including TCP, UDP, and SCTP, as well as a variety of test configurations. This flexibility allows users to tailor the tests to match specific network conditions and requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Netperf is free to use and can be easily accessed by anyone. This encourages community involvement, fostering an environment where users can contribute to and improve the tool.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Netperf runs on a variety of operating systems, including Linux, UNIX, and Windows, making it a versatile choice for network performance testing across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of netperf

  • Command-Line Interface
    Netperf primarily operates through a command-line interface, which can be complex and unintuitive for users who prefer graphical user interfaces or are not experienced with command-line operations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find it challenging to properly use Netperf due to its wide array of options and configurations. Understanding all the nuances of the tool to perform effective tests can require a significant learning effort.
  • Limited Documentation
    While there is documentation available, it may not be as extensive or as user-friendly as needed, which can make it hard for beginners to quickly find the information they need to execute specific tests.
  • Specialized Use Case
    Netperf is highly specialized for network performance testing, which limits its utility outside of networking contexts. Users seeking a tool with broader capabilities beyond network measurement might need to look elsewhere.

mtr videos

35" Goodyear MTR Tire Review | Jeep TJ

More videos:

  • Review - Exploring Traditions & Tasting the VEGETARIAN LUNCH THALI At Mavalli Tiffin Rooms | MTR | Bangalore
  • Review - CZ MTR 457 MATCH .22LR first impressions review

netperf videos

netperf

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mtr and netperf)
IP Data
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
36 36%
64% 64
Network & Admin
51 51%
49% 49
Log Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using mtr and netperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mtr seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mtr mentions (1)

  • Show HN: How did YOUR computer reach my server?
    Interesting, I didn't know traceroute used UDP by default. Just did some testing with the best traceroute tool, mtr[0], and using the -u flag for UDP seemed to give the worst results. -t for TCP seemed OK. I never thought about the difference between how TCP and ICMP packets are handled. [0] https://bitwizard.nl/mtr/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

netperf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of netperf yet. Tracking of netperf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mtr and netperf, you can also consider the following products

ipgeolocation.io - Free IP Geolocation API and Accurate GeoIP Lookup Location Database

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

ipinfo.io - Simple IP address information.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

ifconfig.me - Get my IP Address

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.