Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

mtr VS JPerf

Compare mtr VS JPerf and see what are their differences

mtr logo mtr

mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

JPerf logo JPerf

This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.
  • mtr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22
  • JPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-10

mtr features and specs

  • Real-time Network Diagnostics
    MTR (My Traceroute) provides real-time statistics on the network path, including packet loss and latency, which helps in diagnosing network issues promptly.
  • Combination of Ping and Traceroute
    MTR combines the functionalities of both ping and traceroute, allowing for comprehensive analysis by showing the route and performance metrics for each hop along the path.
  • Continuous Monitoring
    Unlike traditional traceroute that runs once, MTR continuously sends packets, providing ongoing updates on the network status, which helps in identifying intermittent issues.
  • Visualization Options
    MTR includes both console-based and GUI-based interfaces, catering to different user preferences and making it easier to visualize the network performance.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    MTR is available on multiple operating systems including Linux, BSD variants, and macOS, ensuring that it can be used in various environments.

Possible disadvantages of mtr

  • Potential Overhead
    Continuous monitoring by MTR can add network overhead, especially in congested networks, possibly impacting performance.
  • Security Concerns
    Using MTR might pose security risks, as it continuously sends packets to remote hosts. This can be exploited to perform network reconnaissance or be flagged by security systems.
  • Requires Administrative Privileges
    Running MTR typically requires administrative or root privileges, which may not be available in all environments or may pose security risks if improperly managed.
  • Limited Network Layer Support
    MTR primarily functions at the IP layer and might not provide insights into application-specific issues or issues at different OSI layers, limiting its diagnostic capabilities for complex problems.
  • Dependency on External Conditions
    The accuracy and usefulness of MTR reports can be affected by variables like network congestion, traffic shaping, and firewall rules, which can lead to misleading conclusions about network health.

JPerf features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    JPerf provides a graphical user interface, making it easier for users who are not comfortable with command line tools to perform network performance testing.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    JPerf is built on Java, which allows it to run on multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS without modifications.
  • Network Performance Visualization
    JPerf offers graphical representations of network performance, such as throughput and jitter, making it easier to understand the results.
  • Integration with iPerf
    JPerf utilizes iPerf as the backend, benefiting from iPerf's robust network performance testing capabilities.
  • Customizable Testing Parameters
    Users can customize parameters like protocols, port numbers, and bandwidth, providing flexibility in performance testing.

Possible disadvantages of JPerf

  • Abandonware
    JPerf has not been actively maintained for several years, which means it may lack support for new features or bug fixes.
  • Limited Functionality Compared to CLI
    While the GUI is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities available in the iPerf command line version are not accessible in JPerf.
  • Dependency on Java
    As JPerf requires Java to run, users must ensure that Java is installed and correctly configured on their systems.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Due to its lack of updates, JPerf may face compatibility issues with newer versions of operating systems or Java.

Analysis of mtr

Overall verdict

  • Yes, mtr (from bitwizard.nl) is generally considered a useful tool.

Why this product is good

  • MTR (My Traceroute) combines the functionality of the traceroute and ping programs in a single network diagnostic tool. It allows users to diagnose network connections by providing real-time analysis of the network route taken to reach a target server. Its ability to provide detailed insights into network performance makes it particularly valuable for identifying issues such as latency, packet loss, and routing problems.

Recommended for

  • Network administrators looking to troubleshoot and diagnose network connectivity issues.
  • IT professionals who need to perform detailed network performance analysis.
  • Individuals wanting a comprehensive tool to monitor network path reliability.

mtr videos

35" Goodyear MTR Tire Review | Jeep TJ

More videos:

  • Review - Exploring Traditions & Tasting the VEGETARIAN LUNCH THALI At Mavalli Tiffin Rooms | MTR | Bangalore
  • Review - CZ MTR 457 MATCH .22LR first impressions review

JPerf videos

[HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to mtr and JPerf)
IP Data
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
28 28%
72% 72
Network & Admin
51 51%
49% 49
Online Services
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using mtr and JPerf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mtr seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

mtr mentions (1)

  • Show HN: How did YOUR computer reach my server?
    Interesting, I didn't know traceroute used UDP by default. Just did some testing with the best traceroute tool, mtr[0], and using the -u flag for UDP seemed to give the worst results. -t for TCP seemed OK. I never thought about the difference between how TCP and ICMP packets are handled. [0] https://bitwizard.nl/mtr/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

JPerf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JPerf yet. Tracking of JPerf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mtr and JPerf, you can also consider the following products

ipinfo.io - Simple IP address information.

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

ipgeolocation.io - Free IP Geolocation API and Accurate GeoIP Lookup Location Database

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

ipwhois.io - ipwhois.io is an API that provides a users location (country, region, city, currency, currency symbol etc) based on their IP address. Get the accurate location information with our IP Lookup API and IP Location Database for any IP address.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...