NASM
Yasm
Easy code
Pelles C
GNUSim8085
86Box
JWasm
A fast and efficient self-assembling x86 assembler for DOS, Windows and Linux.

Hex Workshop
PilotEdit
BinHex CryPactor
HextEdit
Hecate
File Peek
DHEX
iHex is the premier hex editor and data analysis tool for Mac OS X.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, flat assembler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
f
flat assembler
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | flatassembler.net | ihex.co.id |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Share your experience with using flat assembler and iHex. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Oh neat! Thanks for the link, I hadn't heard of fasmg before. It looks like fasmg builds up from the byte level, so it would only work for architectures that use 8-bit words. Torque builds up from the bit level, so it can assemble code... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Tracking iHex since Jun 2023.
When comparing flat assembler and iHex, you can also consider the following products.

The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...
Compare NASM to flat assembler or iHex:

Hex Workshop: Hex Editor, Sector Editor, Base Converter and Hex Calculator for Windows
Compare Hex Workshop to flat assembler or iHex:

PilotEdit Lite is an advanced text and hex editor that supports opening of files larger than 4GB.
Compare PilotEdit to flat assembler or iHex:

Easy Code is the visual assembly programming environment made to build 32-bit Windows applications.
Compare Easy code to flat assembler or iHex:

Manipulate binary and hexadecimal strings!
Compare BinHex CryPactor to flat assembler or iHex: