FirstPage VS VisualEditor

First Page is a free web builder to design and manage the professional level of websites as you want.

VisualEditor gives you the ability to edit without needing to learn wikitext markup, as is required by the default wikitext editor.

User-Friendly Interface
FirstPage offers a user-friendly interface, which makes it accessible for beginners and non-technical users to design web pages with ease.
Free Software
It is free to download and use, which is beneficial for individuals and small businesses looking to design websites without financial investment.
HTML and CSS Support
FirstPage provides robust support for HTML and CSS, allowing users to create and edit web pages with control over code.
Built-in Tools
It comes with a variety of built-in tools and features like syntax highlighting and error checking, which can enhance productivity.

Outdated Design
The software may feel outdated compared to modern web design tools, potentially lacking some advanced features found in newer platforms.
Limited Advanced Features
While it covers basics well, it might not have the depth of features required by advanced users or professional web developers.
Support and Updates
Since FirstPage has been around for a long time, it may not receive frequent updates or active support, affecting its compatibility with the latest web standards.
Windows Only
FirstPage is limited to Windows OS, which restricts its use for users on other major systems like macOS or Linux.

User-Friendly Interface
VisualEditor provides a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) interface, making it more accessible for users who are not familiar with wiki markup language.
Real-Time Editing Feedback
Changes are immediately visible, allowing users to see how their edits will appear on the page without the need to preview separately.
Reduces Entry Barrier
By simplifying the editing process, VisualEditor invites more contributors who might be intimidated by traditional editing methods.
Improved Accessibility
It enhances accessibility for people with disabilities, as navigating and editing are more straightforward with the visual cues provided.
Consistent Style Guide
Helps maintain a consistent style across articles by embedding templates and standard formats directly into the editing process.

Performance Issues
VisualEditor can sometimes be slower to load and operate compared to the traditional wikitext editor, especially on large pages.
Limited Features
While convenient, VisualEditor may lack some advanced features available in the traditional markup editor, restricting power users' capabilities.
Occasional Bugs
As with any complex software, users may encounter bugs or glitches that disrupt the editing process.
Higher Resource Demand
VisualEditor requires more computing resources, which can be problematic for users with older devices or slower internet connections.
Learning Curve for Advanced Users
Experienced users of the traditional editor might find transitioning to VisualEditor challenging due to different workflows and controls.