Software Alternatives & Startups

Filestack VS AWS Lambda

Compare Filestack VS AWS Lambda and see what are their differences

Filestack

Simple file uploader and robust APIs for uploading, transforming, and delivering any file into your app. Filestack is a collection of tools and powerful APIs that make it simple to upload, transform, and deliver content.

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source Paid $69 / Monthly
AWS Lambda

Automatic, event-driven compute service

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, AWS Lambda seems to be a lot more popular than Filestack. While we know about 297 links to AWS Lambda, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Filestack.

social mentions
6 vs 297
Digital Asset Management popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
172 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Filestack
AWS Lambda
Website filestack.com aws.amazon.com
Pricing
Open source Paid $69 / Monthly Official pricing
Open source
Platforms
Cloud Windows Linux
—
Company 2012 —
Listed in

About Filestack and AWS Lambda

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Filestack
AWS Lambda

Filestack is a cloud-based file management platform that provides tools for uploading, transforming, and delivering files in web, mobile, and desktop applications. Its features include a picker UI, which allows users to upload files from their local computers and various external sources, and the...

Read more about Filestack

No description of AWS Lambda yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Filestack 7 features
AWS Lambda 6 features
  • CDN
  • File Converter
  • Machine Learning
  • Workflows
  • API-friendly
  • Video and Audio Processing
  • Supported SDKs
    6
  • Scalability
    AWS Lambda automatically scales your application by running your code in response to each trigger. This means no manual intervention is required to handle varying levels of traffic.
  • Cost-effectiveness
    You only pay for the compute time you consume. Billing is metered in increments of 100 milliseconds and you are not charged when your code is not running.
  • Reduced Operations Overhead
    AWS Lambda abstracts the infrastructure management layer, so there is no need to manage or provision servers. This allows you to focus more on writing code for your applications.
  • Flexibility
    Supports multiple programming languages such as Python, Node.js, Ruby, Java, Go, and .NET, which allows you to use the language you are most comfortable with.
  • Integration with Other AWS Services
    Seamlessly integrates with many other AWS services such as S3, DynamoDB, RDS, SNS, and more, making it versatile and highly functional.
  • Automatic Scaling and Load Balancing
    Handles thousands of concurrent requests without managing the scaling yourself, making it suitable for applications requiring high availability and reliability.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cold Start Latency
    The first request to a Lambda function after it has been idle for a certain period can take longer to execute. This is referred to as a 'cold start' and can impact performance.
  • Resource Limits
    Lambda has defined limits, such as a maximum execution timeout of 15 minutes, memory allocation ranging from 128 MB to 10,240 MB, and temporary storage up to 512 MB.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Using AWS Lambda ties you into the AWS ecosystem, making it difficult to migrate to another cloud provider or an on-premises solution without significant modifications to your application.
  • Complexity of Debugging
    Debugging and monitoring distributed, serverless applications can be more complex compared to traditional applications due to the lack of direct access to the underlying infrastructure.
  • Cold Start Issues with VPC
    When Lambda functions are configured to access resources within a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), the cold start latency can be exacerbated due to additional VPC networking overhead.
  • Limited Execution Control
    AWS Lambda is designed for stateless, short-running tasks and may not be suitable for long-running processes or tasks requiring complex orchestration.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Filestack
AWS Lambda

Overall verdict

  • Filestack is generally considered a good choice for businesses and developers in need of comprehensive file management solutions. Its ease of use, scalability, and rich feature set make it a strong contender in the file handling space.

Why this product is good

  • Filestack is known for its robust API and user-friendly interface, which simplify file uploading, processing, and delivery. It offers extensive integrations with various platforms and supports numerous file types and transformations, making it a versatile choice for developers and businesses. The platform's security features and reliable infrastructure are also highly praised, ensuring secure and efficient file management.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need a reliable file upload and processing service.
  • Businesses looking to integrate file handling capabilities without building from scratch.
  • Organizations that require secure and efficient file management tools.
  • Teams that need to support a wide variety of file types and transformations.

Overall verdict

  • AWS Lambda is a strong choice for developers looking for scalable, event-driven applications with minimal management overhead. It is particularly beneficial for applications that experience intermittent traffic or unpredictable workloads.

Why this product is good

  • AWS Lambda is a popular serverless computing service because it allows users to run code without provisioning or managing servers. It automatically scales applications by running code in response to triggers such as HTTP requests, changes in data, or system events. This can significantly reduce operational overhead and costs, as you only pay for the compute time you consume.

Recommended for

  • Developers building microservices or serverless applications.
  • Companies looking to reduce infrastructure management.
  • Startups wanting to quickly deploy applications with limited operational costs.
  • Organizations needing to integrate with other AWS services for a comprehensive solution.
  • Projects with unpredictable or variable workloads that require automatic scaling.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Filestack 6 videos + Add
AWS Lambda 3 videos + Add

Filestack Tutorial Series: Basic Filestack Setup

More videos

  • - Filestack Tutorial Series: Filestack Info
  • - Filestack Tutorial Series: Dropbox Integration
  • - Filestack Review: My Honest Experience with This Cloud File Handling Tool
  • - Filestack Guest Series: How Filestack Transformed My Development Process: A Review by CodeWithMasood
  • - Filestack File Storage Honest Review - Watch Before Using

AWS Lambda Vs EC2 | Serverless Vs EC2 | EC2 Alternatives

More videos

  • - AWS Lambda Tutorial | AWS Tutorial for Beginners | Intro to AWS Lambda | AWS Training | Edureka
  • - AWS Lambda | What is AWS Lambda | AWS Lambda Tutorial for Beginners | Intellipaat

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Filestack
AWS Lambda
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
CDN
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Filestack and AWS Lambda. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Filestack 5.0 · 1 review
AWS Lambda no reviews yet

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Filestack 6 mentions
AWS Lambda 297 mentions
  • Generate Alt Text and Searchable Metadata from User Uploads with Filestack’s Caption API
    This guide walks through how to implement image captioning using Filestack’s file picker. You can try it yourself in the interactive demo below, then copy the code into your own project. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Connect Any File Source to Your Upload Flow with Custom Source
    You’ve probably run into this situation before: your File Picker works fine with local uploads, Google Drive, and Dropbox, but your users need to pull files from somewhere else. Maybe it’s your company’s internal DAM, a headless CMS, or... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • The Art of Cleaning Files Before They Reach Your Server
    Building an application that accepts user content is a standard requirement today. Whether you are running a classroom management tool or a print-on-demand shop, you need to accept files. However, accepting a file in your file uploader... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

View more

View more

Alternatives to Filestack and AWS Lambda

When comparing Filestack and AWS Lambda, you can also consider the following products.