
PublishPapers.online
Zenodo
Open Science Framework
ORCHID
arXiv
Papers We Love
Mendeley
Securely store and manage your research outputs in the cloud, or make them openly available and citable.

OpenGrok
GitHub
Etsy Hound
Atlassian Fisheye
GitHub Copilot
Tabnine
Cody AI
The context layer for your entire codebase

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Sourcegraph seems to be a lot more popular than figshare. While we know about 37 links to Sourcegraph, we've tracked only 3 mentions of figshare.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | figshare.com | sourcegraph.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | 2013 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of figshare yet.
Empower agents and developers to make faster decisions, improve AI-generated code, and execute code changes at scale.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of figshare yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Figshare for Institutions Admin User Guide Video: Reviewing Items
More videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkaVq2c7-2w
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing figshare and Sourcegraph.
Sourcegraph's answer:
Quinn Slack and Beyang Liu founded Sourcegraph in 2013. They met at Stanford and later worked together at Palantir, where they saw how hard it was for developers to understand large enterprise codebases. Engineers at Google had strong internal code search, and almost nobody else did. Sourcegraph set out to give every company that ability. It started as universal code search, grew into code intelligence and large-scale automated changes, and now provides the context layer for AI agents. The pitch has stayed the same throughout: AI makes it faster to write code, which makes knowing what’s in your codebase more important, and Sourcegraph is the source of truth for that code.
Sourcegraph's answer:
Sourcegraph's answer:
Most alternatives are tied to one code host or are coding assistants that only see the repo in front of them. Sourcegraph sits beneath those tools rather than replacing them. It makes Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, and Codex more accurate by giving them context from the whole codebase.
Sourcegraph's answer:
Large engineering organizations with big, sprawling codebases spread across many repos and code hosts, often in regulated industries like financial services. The buyers are the VP of Engineering (productivity and AI ROI), the Head of Platform/DevEx (developer tooling, migrations, agent infrastructure), and the CISO (finding vulnerabilities and fixing them across the codebase). Day-to-day users are developers, platform teams, and increasingly AI agents.
Sourcegraph's answer:
The MCP Server gives the same context to whatever AI agents a team already uses, and Agentic Batch Changes turns a plain-language request into pull requests across hundreds of repos.
Share your experience with using figshare and Sourcegraph. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I'll put a shoutout for https://zenodo.org/ and https://figshare.com/ as places to put your data, where you'll get a DOI and can let someone that's not a company look after hosting and backing it up. Zenodo is hosted as long as CERN is... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
-Crystal growing information Http://xrayweb.chem.ou.edu/notes/xtalgrow.html Https://www.chemistryviews.org/details/education/2538901/Tips\_and\_Tricks\_for\_the\_Lab\_Growing\_Crystals\_Part\_2.html Free science ... Source: about 5 years ago
I am a PhD student and conducting a clinical trial in eczema. I have used figshare.com to make my work public, which is used by many universities and academics to disseminate their work for free! No doubt that publishing in journals is... Source: about 5 years ago
The setup is one prompt long. You tell the agent to install Sourcegraph for semantic code search or xerj.org for patch and impact analysis. From that point it runs unattended:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Sourcegraph | Remote | Full-Time | SWE, Tech Lead, Agent Engineer, Product Manager, Product Marketing Manager | https://sourcegraph.com Sourcegraph is building the context layer for AI-powered software development. As AI accelerates code... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Sourcegraph | San Francisco | Full-Time | SWE, Design Engineer, Forward Deployed Eng, Head of Design, Solutions Eng, Dev Advocate (all roles write code) | https://sourcegraph.com Sourcegraph is hiring SWEs and FDEs for Amp... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
When comparing figshare and Sourcegraph, you can also consider the following products.

Prove you created your research before anyone else. Register academic papers with immutable timestamps. Trusted by students, researchers and institutions.
Compare PublishPapers.online to figshare or Sourcegraph:

OpenGrok is a fast and usable source code search and cross reference engine.
Compare OpenGrok to figshare or Sourcegraph:


Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to figshare or Sourcegraph:

Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.
Compare Open Science Framework to figshare or Sourcegraph:

Hound is an extremely fast source code search engine.
Compare Etsy Hound to figshare or Sourcegraph: