Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Feedback Tools VS Roadmark

Compare Feedback Tools VS Roadmark and see what are their differences

Feedback Tools logo Feedback Tools

Curated directory of tools for getting all the feedback

Roadmark logo Roadmark

A visual roadmap you branch rather than overwrite: both timelines stay, each with its own decision. Syncs from Linear, Jira, GitHub, and more, so a shared link stays true.
Visit Website
  • Feedback Tools Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-19
  • Roadmark Visual roadmap board with branched timelines
    Visual roadmap board with branched timelines //
    2026-07-28
  • Roadmark Every branch carries a written decision
    Every branch carries a written decision //
    2026-07-28
  • Roadmark Import and sync from Linear, Jira, Notion and 7 more
    Import and sync from Linear, Jira, Notion and 7 more //
    2026-07-28
  • Roadmark A public decision feed for stakeholders
    A public decision feed for stakeholders //
    2026-07-28

Roadmark is a roadmap tool for teams whose plans keep changing.

Most roadmaps die the same way: a date moves, someone overwrites it, and the reason is lost. Six weeks later, nobody trusts the board, and the link you shared with a customer or an investor is quietly wrong.

Roadmark makes a change of plan a first-class object. Instead of overwriting a timeline, you branch it: the original plan and the new one both stay on the board, side by side, and every branch carries a written decision explaining why the direction changed.

It keeps itself current. Boards sync from Linear, Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Asana, Notion, monday.com, Shortcut, Azure DevOps and YouTrack โ€” or from CSV. Sync runs daily, so a link you shared months ago still shows the real plan.

Built for sharing outward. Public read-only links, password-protected or expiring links, an embeddable widget for your own site, plus comments, reactions and email follow-ups from viewers โ€” so the roadmap becomes the page stakeholders check, not another internal tool.

Also included: milestone confidence and slip history, board snapshots and diffs, PNG/SVG/PDF/PPTX export, an investor digest, a template gallery, real-time collaboration, and an audit log on Team.

Optional AI drafts milestones, writes decision notes, and runs a pre-mortem stress test of the plan โ€” with your own API key, or from an included monthly quota.

Free for up to 3 boards. Pro $15/month, Team $49/month.

Feedback Tools

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Roadmark

$ Details
freemium $15 / Monthly (Pro โ€” flat rate, unlimited boards, 4 members)
Platforms
Web SaaS
Release Date
2026 July
Startup details
Country
United Kingdom
State
England
City
London
Founder(s)
Aleksandr Tretiakov
Employees
1 - 9

Feedback Tools features and specs

  • Comprehensive Range of Tools
    Feedback Tools offers a wide variety of instruments to gather different types of feedback, including surveys, polls, and user reviews. This comprehensive range ensures that users can select the most appropriate tool for their needs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with a user-friendly interface, making it easy for users with varying degrees of technical skill to create and manage feedback mechanisms.
  • Analytics and Reporting
    Feedback Tools provide robust analytics and reporting features, which help users to interpret feedback data effectively and make data-driven decisions.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform supports integration with various third-party applications and services, allowing users to streamline their feedback processes and integrate the feedback data with other business tools.
  • Customization Options
    It offers extensive customization options, enabling users to tailor feedback instruments to match their specific requirements and branding.

Possible disadvantages of Feedback Tools

  • Cost
    Some of the advanced features and tools may be available only in the paid versions, potentially making it an expensive option for small businesses or individuals with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the extensive range of features and customization options can result in a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    As a web-based tool, its functionality is highly dependent on the stability and speed of the user's internet connection, which might be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Feedback Tools may offer limited capabilities when it comes to collecting and managing feedback offline, which can be a disadvantage for users needing to gather data in offline environments.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Handling sensitive user feedback data online raises potential data privacy and security concerns. Users must ensure that the platform complies with relevant privacy regulations.

Roadmark features and specs

  • Branching timelines
    Change a plan by branching it, not overwriting it โ€” the original and the new timeline both stay on the board, side by side.
  • Decision log
    Every branch requires a written decision, so the reason a date moved survives the move itself.
  • Sync sources
    Linear, Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Asana, Notion, monday.com, Shortcut, Azure DevOps, YouTrack and CSV.
  • Automatic sync
    Boards re-sync daily, so a link shared months ago still shows the current plan. Any single milestone can be force-synced.
  • Public sharing
    Read-only public links, password-protected and expiring links, and an embeddable widget for your own site.
  • Viewer feedback
    Comments, reactions and email follow on public boards โ€” no account needed to react or follow.
  • Milestone confidence
    Confidence level per milestone plus an append-only slip history showing every date change.
  • Snapshots and diffs
    Point-in-time board snapshots with a visual diff of what changed between them.
  • Export
    PNG, SVG, PDF and PPTX export, plus an investor digest you can send by email.
  • Optional AI
    Drafts milestones, writes decision notes and runs a pre-mortem stress test โ€” with your own API key or an included monthly quota.
  • Seat model
    Flat per-workspace pricing. Unlimited members on Team, and read-only viewers never consume a seat.

Analysis of Feedback Tools

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Feedback Tools is a robust platform for feedback management. It meets the needs of both small and large organizations looking to improve engagement and decision-making through effective feedback collection.

Why this product is good

  • Feedback Tools (feedbacktools.org) is considered good because it offers a user-friendly interface for collecting and analyzing feedback from various stakeholders. It provides valuable insights through its reporting features and supports a range of feedback methods to suit different needs. The platform is known for its strong customer support and continuous updates that enhance usability and feature set.

Recommended for

  • Organizations seeking to improve stakeholder engagement
  • Educational institutions looking for student feedback solutions
  • Businesses aiming to enhance customer experience
  • HR departments focusing on employee feedback and satisfaction

Feedback Tools videos

Customer Feedback Tools

Roadmark videos

Yellow and White Road Marking Lines Meaning #roadmarkings #driving

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Feedback Tools and Roadmark)
Customer Feedback
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
Product Roadmaps
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Feedback Tools and Roadmark.

What makes your product unique?

Roadmark's answer:

Roadmark treats a change of plan as something you record, not something you erase. Every roadmap tool lets you drag a milestone to a new date โ€” and the old date, along with the reason it moved, quietly disappears. In Roadmark you branch the timeline instead: the original plan and the new one both stay on the board, side by side, and the branch carries a written decision explaining the change. Six months later the board answers "why did this slip?" on its own, without anyone digging through Slack.

The other half is that the board keeps itself current. It syncs daily from Linear, Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Asana, Notion, monday.com, Shortcut, Azure DevOps and YouTrack, so a link you shared with a customer or an investor doesn't silently stop being true.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Roadmark's answer:

Three concrete reasons.

Branching with a decision log. Productboard, Aha! and Roadmunk all show you the plan as it stands today. Roadmark shows you how it got there โ€” every pivot kept, each with the reasoning attached.

Pricing that doesn't punish sharing. Pricing is flat per workspace, not per seat. Team includes unlimited members, and read-only viewers never consume a seat at all โ€” so putting the roadmap in front of customers and stakeholders costs nothing extra.

Built to be shared outward. Public read-only links, password-protected and expiring links, an embeddable widget, and comments, reactions, and email follow for viewers without an account.

Where Roadmark is not the answer: if what you need is a feedback and prioritisation suite โ€” collecting feature requests, scoring them, running customer boards โ€” Productboard and ProdPad do that, and Roadmark does not.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Roadmark's answer:

Small product and engineering teams, roughly 2โ€“20 people, where the plan changes often and someone outside the team keeps asking where things stand: founders reporting to investors, product managers at startups, agencies and consultancies reporting to clients, and indie makers running a public roadmap.

What's the story behind your product?

Roadmark's answer:

Roadmark was built in 2026 around one observation: roadmaps don't fail because teams plan badly; they fail because plans change and the tools only store the latest version. A date moves, the bar gets dragged, and the reason is gone. Six weeks later the board is no longer true, and nobody trusts it enough to look.

So the plan itself became the thing worth versioning. Keep the old timeline, branch to the new one, attach the decision to the branch. Sync, public links, and the decision feed all exist for the same purpose: to keep that history accurate without anyone maintaining it by hand.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Roadmark's answer:

Next.js 15 (App Router) and TypeScript on the front end, Tailwind CSS 4 for styling, Supabase (PostgreSQL, Realtime and Auth) as the backend, and Vercel for hosting. Tested with Vitest and Playwright.

User comments

Share your experience with using Feedback Tools and Roadmark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Feedback Tools and Roadmark, you can also consider the following products

Incoming Feedback by Hotjar - Instant visual feedback for your website or app!

productboard - Beautiful and powerful product management.

Customer Feedback Portal - Ask customers what you should build next

Aha! - Aha! is the new way to create visual product roadmaps. Web-based product management tools and roadmapping software for agile product managers.

Roadmunk - Create beautiful product roadmaps quickly. Drag & Drop functionality. Export your roadmaps into formats such as: PPT, PNG & URL. Start for free today.

userinput.io - Get on-demand feedback for your app, website or idea. Learn how to improve by hearing real opinions.