
Snopes
VeriFact
TruthOrFiction
Google Scholar
LegitScan.ai
Healthcare.gov
Media Bias Fact Check
A nonpartisan, nonprofit “consumer advocate” for voters.

Decode and verify SSL/TLS certificates online. Extract X.509 details including issuer, validity, SAN, and fingerprint. Fast, secure, and browser-based.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, FactCheck seems to be a lot more popular than Cert Decoder. While we know about 122 links to FactCheck, we've tracked only 1 mention of Cert Decoder.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | factcheck.org | certdecoder.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of FactCheck yet.
Cert Decoder is a free online tool that helps you decode X.509 SSL/TLS certificates in PEM format. It instantly shows important information like the issuer, expiry date, SAN entries, and fingerprint. All data is processed locally in your browser, so nothing is ever sent or stored elsewhere.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of FactCheck yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing FactCheck and Cert Decoder.
Cert Decoder's answer:
I built certdecoder.com over the weekend for my own needs. Sometimes in my work, I need to verify and check certificate details.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com was built using just JavaScript and HTML—simple, fast, and with all processing happening locally in your browser, so no certificate data is sent to any server
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Cert Decoder's answer:
Simple, fast, and reliable. Some similar tools can’t even decode basic certificates. I rigorously tested my tool with many real-world certificates and covered several edge cases where competitors fall short.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Share your experience with using FactCheck and Cert Decoder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Sute, it has all been 'debunked', presumably by your favourite website, factcheck.org, brought to you by the Annenberg Foundation. RWJF and Facebook. Source: about 3 years ago
This is very very simple. The answer is yes. You're so naive you believe factcheck.org. Source: over 3 years ago
I presented you the facts. He was listed as an owner and shareholder still as of time it was fact checked by factcheck.org in both the USA and China. Source: over 3 years ago
Why? Because I built certdecoder.com and couldn’t find a decent place to submit it. So I said screw it — I’ll build my own. With blackjack and hookers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
When comparing FactCheck and Cert Decoder, you can also consider the following products.

The definitive Internet reference source for urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation.
Compare Snopes to FactCheck or Cert Decoder:

Verifact is a decentralised fact checker which uses blockchain to reward contributors for tracking...
Compare VeriFact to FactCheck or Cert Decoder:


Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...
Compare Google Scholar to FactCheck or Cert Decoder:

AI-powered authentication for any collectible, anywhere.
Compare LegitScan.ai to FactCheck or Cert Decoder:

Since the healthcare law took full effect this year, HealthCare.
Compare Healthcare.gov to FactCheck or Cert Decoder: