Software Alternatives & Startups

Exstats VS Objects

Compare Exstats VS Objects and see what are their differences

Exstats

Analytics for Chrome, Edge, and Firefox extensions in one dashboard. Track installs, ratings, reviews, and search rankings across 360,000 extensions, updated daily.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial
Objects

An online tool to create instructions and user manuals for providing quality customer care

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Exstats
Objects
Website exstats.com objects.to
Pricing
Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Platforms
Web
—
Company Startup from the United States · 2025 —
Listed in

About Exstats and Objects

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Exstats
Objects

Most browser extension developers ship the same product to Chrome, Edge, and Firefox, then try to track its performance across three separate developer dashboards, three different review feeds, and three sets of keyword rankings. The data is fragmented, history is short, and there is no easy way...

Read more about Exstats

No description of Objects yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Exstats 12 features
Objects 5 features
  • Supported stores
    Chrome Web Store, Microsoft Edge Add-ons, Firefox Add-ons
  • Database size
    280,000+ extensions, 6M+ reviews
  • Data refresh
    Daily
  • Historical data
    Up to 1+ year on Business plan
  • Product Dashboard
    Track your listings across all three stores in one view with ratings, users, reviews, and rank
  • Competitor tracking
    Side by side comparison with metrics, reviews, and version updates
  • Keyword tracking
    Daily rank checks with 1D, 7D, 30D deltas and full rank history
  • AI keyword suggestions
    Built in keyword discovery powered by AI
  • Extension Explorer
    Searchable market browser with 30+ fields, filters, and daily deltas
  • Store Trends
    Market level charts for category growth, rating distribution, review activity, and developer counts
  • Alerts
    Email and Slack notifications on ranking, rating, and competitor changes
  • Data export
    CSV and XLSX up to 5,000 rows
  • Decentralized Object Storage
    Objects.to provides decentralized storage solutions, allowing users to store data across distributed networks rather than relying on a single centralized server, which enhances data resilience and reduces single points of failure.
  • Web3 and Blockchain Integration
    The platform is designed with Web3 principles in mind, making it well-suited for developers building decentralized applications (dApps) that need reliable and censorship-resistant storage.
  • Simple API and Developer Experience
    Objects.to offers a straightforward API that makes it relatively easy for developers to integrate decentralized storage into their projects without needing deep expertise in the underlying protocols.
  • Content Persistence
    Data stored through Objects.to benefits from content-addressable storage mechanisms, helping ensure that files remain available and verifiable over time without risk of link rot or unauthorized modification.
  • Cost-Effective Storage
    Compared to traditional cloud storage providers, Objects.to can offer competitive pricing by leveraging decentralized storage networks, potentially reducing costs for developers and businesses storing large amounts of data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Mainstream Adoption
    Objects.to is a relatively niche platform compared to established cloud storage providers like AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage, which means fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations are available.
  • Performance and Latency Concerns
    Decentralized storage can sometimes suffer from higher latency and slower retrieval speeds compared to centralized cloud services that have globally distributed CDNs and optimized infrastructure.
  • Reliability and Uptime Uncertainty
    As a smaller and newer platform, Objects.to may not offer the same level of guaranteed uptime and SLAs that enterprise-grade centralized storage providers commit to.
  • Learning Curve for Non-Web3 Developers
    Developers unfamiliar with decentralized storage concepts, content addressing, and Web3 paradigms may face a steeper learning curve when adopting Objects.to compared to traditional storage solutions.
  • Limited Documentation and Support
    Being a smaller platform, Objects.to may have less comprehensive documentation, fewer support channels, and slower response times for troubleshooting compared to major cloud providers with dedicated support teams.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Exstats
Objects

Overall verdict

  • Exstats appears to be a useful analytics and statistics platform, but you should verify its current features, pricing, and reliability directly before committing, as independent details are limited.

Why this product is good

  • Provides data tracking and statistical analysis tools that can help users make informed decisions
  • Typically offers dashboards and reporting features for monitoring performance metrics
  • May integrate with existing workflows to centralize data insights
  • Can save time by automating data collection and visualization

Recommended for

  • Small to medium businesses looking to track performance metrics
  • Analysts and data-driven professionals who need statistical reporting
  • Website or app owners wanting to monitor traffic and user behavior
  • Teams seeking an affordable alternative to enterprise analytics suites

Overall verdict

  • Objects.to is a niche link-in-bio and personal landing page tool. It appears to offer a minimalist way to consolidate links, but it has limited brand recognition compared to major competitors like Linktree, Bio.link, or Beacons, and detailed independent reviews or long-term reliability data are scarce.

Why this product is good

  • Simple, minimalist interface for creating a single landing page
  • Likely free or low-cost tier for basic use cases
  • Quick setup for consolidating multiple links in one place
  • Lightweight alternative if you dislike bloated link-in-bio tools

Recommended for

  • Individuals wanting a very basic, no-frills link page
  • Users experimenting with alternatives to mainstream link-in-bio services
  • Small creators who don't need advanced analytics or customization
  • Those prioritizing simplicity over extensive design options

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Exstats
Objects
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Exstats and Objects.

What makes your product unique?

Exstats's answer

Exstats treats an extension as one product across stores, not as three separate listings on three sites. The Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions sit in one row, and history, reviews, alerts, and competitor data flow from there.

What's the story behind your product?

Exstats's answer

Exstats started because developers shipping browser extensions kept running into the same wall. The Chrome Web Store, Edge Add-ons, and Firefox Add-ons each give publishers a siloed view with short history, no competitor data, and no way to compare a release against a rival over time. Teams that maintained extensions on more than one store ended up checking three dashboards a day and keeping competitor numbers in spreadsheets. We built Exstats so an extension and its store versions live in one place, with daily history, alerts, and competitor tracking built in.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Exstats's answer

Unified multi-browser view. Exstats is the only dashboard that groups the Chrome, Edge, and Firefox versions of an extension into one product, with shared history and shared alerts. Most analytics tools cover only the Chrome Web Store, or split the three stores across separate sites.

Full year of daily history. Stores show current numbers and a short trail. Exstats keeps daily snapshots for up to a year so weekly and monthly trends, rating regressions, and competitor launches are visible at a glance.

Reviews from every store in one table. Chrome, Edge, and Firefox reviews sit in one sortable, filterable table, so a developer can read a week of feedback without rotating between three dashboards.

Keyword tracking with AI suggestions. Search rank is tracked per store with daily change indicators, and the keyword tool suggests new keywords from competitor listings rather than expecting the developer to bring a complete list.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Exstats's answer

Exstats is built for the people shipping and growing browser extensions.

The core audience is independent extension developers and small product teams who need one place to watch installs, ratings, reviews, and keyword rank for their extensions, on whichever stores they publish to.

A second audience is extension growth and marketing specialists who track competitor launches, rating shifts, and category trends on behalf of clients and need a single view across Chrome, Edge, and Firefox rather than three separate workflows.

A third audience is product and engineering teams at companies whose extension is a meaningful acquisition or retention surface, who need daily alerts, exportable data, and API access for internal dashboards.

User comments

Share your experience with using Exstats and Objects. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to Exstats and Objects

When comparing Exstats and Objects, you can also consider the following products.