As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, emqtt
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
6 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
6 vs 0
IoT Connectivity popularity
100% vs 0%
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
High Performance eMQTT is designed for high performance and can handle millions of connections concurrently. It's optimized for both latency and throughput, making it ideal for large-scale IoT applications.
Scalability eMQTT can scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster. This makes it easy to adjust the system according to the growing number of devices and data throughput requirements.
Extensibility eMQTT supports various plugins and extensions that can be used to add additional functionalities or integrate with other systems.
Rich Feature Set It offers features like TLS/SSL encryption, authentication, authorization, message logging, and various MQTT protocol extensions, providing a comprehensive solution for messaging needs.
Open Source As an open-source project, eMQTT allows for greater transparency, customizability, and community support. Developers can adapt the code to better fit their specific requirements.
Cross-Platform Support It supports multiple operating systems including Linux, Mac OS, and Windows, thus offering flexibility in diverse deployment environments.
Multiple Protocols In addition to MQTT, eMQTT supports other protocols such as MQTT-SN, CoAP, and WebSocket, making it versatile for various IoT scenarios.
Good Documentation eMQTT comes with extensive documentation that helps developers understand its features and how to implement them effectively.
Possible disadvantages
Complexity Due to its rich feature set and extensibility, eMQTT can be complex to configure and manage, especially for users who are new to MQTT brokers.
Resource Intensive Being designed for high performance and scalability, eMQTT can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial CPU and memory, which might not be suitable for resource-constrained environments.
Learning Curve The myriad features and configurations can present a steep learning curve for new users or those not familiar with MQTT or distributed systems.
Community and Support While it has a growing community, it might not have as extensive support or as large a user base as some other established MQTT brokers, potentially resulting in slower resolutions for community-driven support.
Licensing Costs While eMQTT is open-source, some advanced features and extended support might require a commercial license, which could be a drawback for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
Maintenance Managing and maintaining a scalable eMQTT cluster might require specialized skills and ongoing effort, which can increase the overall operational costs.
No features have been listed yet.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
emqttDiffee
Overall verdict
Yes, EMQTT is considered good, especially for enterprises and developers seeking a reliable and feature-rich MQTT broker tailored for IoT applications.
Why this product is good
EMQTT is a scalable and reliable open-source MQTT broker that supports large-scale deployments and offers high availability with clustering capabilities. It provides a robust platform for IoT applications, supporting millions of concurrent connections and delivering low latency messaging. Additionally, it offers comprehensive protocol support, including MQTT, MQTT-SN, CoAP, and more, along with rich feature sets such as SSL/TLS encryption, authentication, and authorization, enhancing security and operability.
Recommended for
Developers building IoT applications that require scalable messaging infrastructure.
Enterprises looking for secure and reliable MQTT broker solutions with clustering capabilities.
Organizations that need to handle a large number of concurrent device connections.
Projects seeking high performance with support for various messaging protocols.
Share your experience with using emqtt and Diffee.
For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
emqtt6 mentionsDiffee0 mentions
Measuring Crowd Engagement with an MQTT-based IoT App
Before applying our application to the cluster, we need to make sure there is a MQTT broker running that can be reached from within the cluster. For simplicity, we are deploying an EMQX MQTT broker as a Pod in the cluster along with a...
- Source: dev.to
/
almost 2 years ago
EMQX (optional): Open-source MQTT broker for IoT, IIoT, and connected vehicles. Used for managing your toys.
- Source: dev.to
/
over 2 years ago
All right, which one of you did this?
I do know a real world use for Erlang (it also surprised me when I investigated about it), but two of the biggest mqtt brokers are coded in erlang: emqx, vernemq.
Source:
over 3 years ago
EMQX is an open source MQTT 5.0 broker for mission-critical IoT scenarios, massively scalable and highly available clustering, running anywhere from edge to cloud.
Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that
implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto
is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices
