Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

emitter.io VS RemoteStorage

Compare emitter.io VS RemoteStorage and see what are their differences

emitter.io logo emitter.io

Real-time communication service for connecting online devices.

RemoteStorage logo RemoteStorage

An open protocol for per-user storage OWN YOUR DATA
  • emitter.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26
  • RemoteStorage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-15

emitter.io features and specs

  • Scalability
    Emitter.io is designed to handle high loads and can be scaled up to accommodate increasing numbers of connections and messages.
  • Decentralization
    Emitter.io offers a decentralized, peer-to-peer architecture, which can improve reliability and decrease dependency on a single server or point of failure.
  • Real-time Communication
    The platform is optimized for real-time message delivery, catering to applications that require low-latency data exchanges.
  • Security Features
    Emitter.io includes built-in security features such as fine-grained access control with keys, ensuring that only authorized clients can subscribe or publish to channels.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Emitter.io allows developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the source code, tailoring it to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of emitter.io

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a decentralized, real-time messaging system like Emitter.io may require substantial understanding and expertise in distributed systems.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a decentralized architecture can be resource-intensive in terms of network bandwidth and CPU usage, especially when scaling to a large number of nodes.
  • Documentation
    The documentation may not be as comprehensive or regularly updated compared to other more established messaging platforms, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve for new users.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to some more mature platforms, Emitter.io might have a smaller ecosystem of plugins, libraries, and third-party services that can limit out-of-the-box functionality and integrations.

RemoteStorage features and specs

  • User Control
    RemoteStorage allows users to host their own data, giving them greater control over their information and how it's shared with applications. This enhances privacy and security for users.
  • Decentralization
    The platform supports decentralized data storage, reducing reliance on centralized servers and eliminating single points of failure.
  • Interoperability
    RemoteStorage uses a simple protocol that encourages interoperability between various applications, allowing users to switch between apps without losing access to their data.
  • Open Source
    The entire RemoteStorage protocol and libraries are open source, fostering transparency and allowing developers to contribute to its development.
  • Developer-Friendly
    Developers can easily use RemoteStorage libraries to integrate the protocol into their applications, facilitating seamless data management across different services.

Possible disadvantages of RemoteStorage

  • Setup Complexity
    While RemoteStorage offers user control, the need to set up a personal data hosting solution might be complex and challenging for non-technical users.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    As a relatively niche solution, the ecosystem of applications supporting RemoteStorage might be smaller compared to more ubiquitous cloud storage services.
  • Performance Variability
    The performance of data access and synchronization can be variable depending on the hosting infrastructure chosen by the user, potentially leading to slower speeds.
  • Data Management Responsibility
    Users are responsible for managing backups and ensuring data availability, which can add an additional layer of responsibility and risk.
  • Potential Scalability Issues
    Depending on how the personal storage solution is set up, users might experience scalability issues as their storage needs grow.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to emitter.io and RemoteStorage)
Developer Tools
23 23%
77% 77
Mobile Push Messaging
43 43%
57% 57
Realtime Backend / API
25 25%
75% 75
App Development
34 34%
66% 66

User comments

Share your experience with using emitter.io and RemoteStorage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RemoteStorage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

emitter.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of emitter.io yet. Tracking of emitter.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

RemoteStorage mentions (22)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing emitter.io and RemoteStorage, you can also consider the following products

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

restdb.io - restdb.io lets you create databases and REST APIs quickly. Development databases are free. Powerful web-based and mobile-friendly data management.

Etebase - Etebase makes it easy to build end-to-end encrypted applications by taking care of the encryption and its related challenges.

GUN - Self-hosted Firebase.

PubNub - PubNub is a real-time messaging system for web and mobile apps that can handle API for all platforms and push messages to any device anywhere in the world in a fraction of a second without having to worry about proxies, firewalls or mobile drop-offs.