Software Alternatives & Startups

Electerm VS Persistent SSH

Compare Electerm VS Persistent SSH and see what are their differences

Electerm

electerm is a terminal/ssh/sftp client(linux, mac, win) based on electron/ssh2/node-pty/xterm/antd and many other libs

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Persistent SSH

Persistent SSH is SSH tunnel manager for a Windows systems.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Persistent SSH seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
SSH popularity
55% vs 45%
alternatives listed
68 vs 66

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Electerm
Persistent SSH
Website electerm.html5beta.com persistentssh.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Electerm 6 features
Persistent SSH 5 features
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Electerm is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible for users on different operating systems.
  • Multi-Protocol Support
    It supports multiple protocols including SSH, SFTP, and Serial, providing flexibility for connecting to different types of servers and devices.
  • Tabbed Interface
    The application allows for multiple sessions in a single window using tabs, which enhances multitasking and organization.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Electerm offers a modern and intuitive user interface, making it easy for both new and experienced users to navigate.
  • Integrated File Transfer
    With built-in SFTP support, users can easily upload and download files within the same application without needing external tools.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, the software provides transparency, and the community can contribute to its development and improvement.

Possible disadvantages

  • Resource Intensive
    Electerm can be more resource-intensive compared to some other terminal emulators, which may affect performance on lower-end systems.
  • Limited Customization
    While it offers a range of features, the level of customization available may not meet the needs of all advanced users who prefer highly tailored setups.
  • Reliance on Electron
    Being an Electron-based application, it inherits the limitations of Electron, such as potentially larger installation sizes and performance overhead.
  • Less Mature Compared to Alternatives
    Compared to some other established terminal emulators, Electerm may lack the maturity and extensive track record, which some users prefer for stability.
  • Community Support
    As a less widespread software, the user community and available support might be limited compared to more popular terminal utilities.
  • Reliable Connectivity
    Persistent SSH provides a stable and continuous SSH connection, which is beneficial for applications that require uninterrupted connectivity.
  • Session Management
    It offers robust session management features, allowing users to resume their work seamlessly even after network interruptions.
  • Security Features
    The platform incorporates strong encryption and authentication methods, ensuring secure data transmission over SSH connections.
  • Ease of Use
    Persistent SSH is designed to be user-friendly, making it easy for both technical and non-technical users to establish and maintain SSH connections.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple operating systems, providing flexibility and accessibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    The service may involve subscription fees or usage costs, which can be a downside for users looking for free alternatives.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    While it is user-friendly, some initial setup and configuration might be complex for users unfamiliar with SSH or networking concepts.
  • Internet Dependency
    The effectiveness of Persistent SSH relies on internet connectivity, which might pose issues in areas with poor network infrastructure.
  • Limited Features Compared to Alternatives
    Some alternatives might offer more comprehensive features or integrations that are not available with Persistent SSH.
  • Potential Security Risks if Misconfigured
    If not properly configured, there may be security vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Electerm
Persistent SSH
55% 55%
SSH
45% 45%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Electerm and Persistent SSH. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Electerm 0 mentions
Persistent SSH 1 mention

Tracking Electerm since Mar 2021.

  • ssh tunneling
    KiTTy (A PuTTy derivative) has support for SSH-tunnels build-in. If you like the results then you can use something like persistant SSH tunnels (or a FOSS alternative) to maintain them. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to Electerm and Persistent SSH

When comparing Electerm and Persistent SSH, you can also consider the following products.