Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ejabberd VS Matrix.org

Compare ejabberd VS Matrix.org and see what are their differences

ejabberd logo ejabberd

ejabberd is a robust, massively scalable and extensible XMPP server.

Matrix.org logo Matrix.org

Matrix is an open standard for decentralized persistent communication over IP.
  • ejabberd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-22
  • Matrix.org Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-21

ejabberd features and specs

  • Scalability
    ejabberd is designed to handle large numbers of concurrent users, making it highly scalable. Its architecture can efficiently manage thousands of connections, catering to large-scale deployments.
  • High Availability
    It supports clustering and distributed deployments, ensuring that services remain available even when single nodes fail, thus providing robust reliability.
  • Compliance with Standards
    ejabberd complies with XMPP standards and protocols, ensuring compatibility with other XMPP-based applications and services.
  • Extensibility and Customization
    Offers flexibility via modules, allowing developers to extend and customize its functionalities to fit specific use cases, thanks to its modular architecture.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Works on multiple operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and MacOS, providing flexibility in deployment environments.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, ejabberd benefits from a community of developers contributing to its growth and improvement.

Possible disadvantages of ejabberd

  • Complex Setup and Configuration
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for those unfamiliar with Erlang, the language ejabberd is written in.
  • Resource Intensive
    Given its scalability features, ejabberd can be resource-intensive, which might be overkill for small-scale applications.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a learning curve when integrating and maintaining ejabberd, mainly due to its extensive feature set.
  • Documentation Quality
    While the documentation is comprehensive, it might be perceived as less user-friendly or lacking in examples, which could hinder new developers.
  • Erlang Requirement
    Development or troubleshooting may require knowledge of Erlang, which is not as widely used or known as other programming languages.

Matrix.org features and specs

  • Decentralization
    Matrix.org is built on a decentralized architecture, meaning no single entity controls the entire network. This ensures greater resilience, scalability, and prevents single points of failure.
  • Interoperability
    The platform is designed to bridge communications with other networks, such as Slack, IRC, and others, facilitating seamless interaction across different services.
  • End-to-End Encryption
    Matrix.org supports end-to-end encryption, ensuring that conversations are secure and private, and only accessible to the intended recipients.
  • Open-Source
    Matrix.org is an open-source project, allowing anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, which promotes transparency and continuous improvement.
  • Rich Communication
    The platform supports a variety of communication forms, including text, voice, video, and file sharing, making it versatile for different use cases.

Possible disadvantages of Matrix.org

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up a Matrix server can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring technical expertise which may not be accessible to all users.
  • Latency
    Due to its decentralized nature, users might experience higher latency compared to centralized messaging platforms, particularly in global communications.
  • Limited Network
    While Matrix is growing, its network is still smaller compared to mainstream alternatives, which might affect user adoption and community size.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a Matrix server can be resource-intensive in terms of memory and CPU usage, which might demand higher infrastructure costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Users and administrators might face a steep learning curve due to the complexity of Matrix's features and configurations.

Analysis of Matrix.org

Overall verdict

  • Matrix.org is considered a good platform for secure and decentralized communication.

Why this product is good

  • Matrix.org offers a decentralized communication protocol that ensures user privacy and security. It allows users to host their own servers, providing greater control over data. The platform supports end-to-end encryption, making it a reliable choice for confidential communications. Additionally, Matrix.org has a vibrant open-source community and supports interoperability, allowing communication between different platforms.

Recommended for

    Matrix.org is recommended for individuals and organizations that prioritize privacy and security in their communications. It's ideal for tech-savvy users who value open-source solutions and those who seek to avoid centralized communication platforms. Additionally, it's suitable for developers looking to build custom communication solutions using a versatile protocol.

ejabberd videos

Build a Cordova Chat APP using Strophe and eJabberd : XMPP Basics

Matrix.org videos

No Matrix.org videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ejabberd and Matrix.org)
Group Chat & Notifications
Communication
3 3%
97% 97
Chat
100 100%
0% 0
Messaging
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ejabberd and Matrix.org. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ejabberd and Matrix.org

ejabberd Reviews

We have no reviews of ejabberd yet.
Be the first one to post

Matrix.org Reviews

Top 10 Team Chat Software for a Self-Hosted environment specifically designed for Large Enterprises
Matrix.org never charges. It's completely free. Its free servers are open to all for public registrations.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Matrix.org seems to be a lot more popular than ejabberd. While we know about 593 links to Matrix.org, we've tracked only 2 mentions of ejabberd. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ejabberd mentions (2)

  • What you gonna add to your selfhost stack this year?
    Also a fan of XMPP, ejabberd.im is a formidable piece of software that pretty much just works once you have it all set up and configured. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Alternative to Signal
    It supports voice and video calls, and you use it on your own server (like prosody.im and ejabberd.im). It's also really simple to get a user to create an account on a server you run/a public one and.... It does not require a phone number or an email address. Source: over 4 years ago

Matrix.org mentions (593)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ejabberd and Matrix.org, you can also consider the following products

Openfire - Openfire (formerly Wildfire) is a cross-platform instant messaging (IM) and groupchat server.

Element.io - Secure messaging app with strong end-to-end encryption, advanced group chat privacy settings, secure video calls for teams, encrypted communication using Matrix open network. Riot.im is now Element.

Prosody - Prosody is a modern flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP written in Lua.

Telegram - Telegram is a messaging app with a focus on speed and security. Itโ€™s superfast, simple and free.

Mattermost - Mattermost is an open source alternative to Slack.

Signal - Fast, simple & secure messaging. Privacy that fits in your pocket.