Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ebean ORM VS Propel ORM

Compare Ebean ORM VS Propel ORM and see what are their differences

Ebean ORM logo Ebean ORM

ORM for Java / Kotlin

Propel ORM logo Propel ORM

Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Microframeworks (Backend)
  • Ebean ORM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-06
  • Propel ORM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-27

Ebean ORM features and specs

  • Simplified ORM
    Ebean ORM simplifies database interactions with an easy-to-use API, which abstracts away much of the complexity involved in handling SQL directly. This allows developers to focus more on business logic rather than database connectivity and queries.
  • Automatic Query Generation
    Ebean automatically generates queries based on the defined entity models, reducing the need for manually crafting complex SQL queries. This feature can save development time and reduce the potential for query-related errors.
  • Lazy Loading Support
    Ebean supports lazy loading, which allows for the efficient retrieval of data by only loading related entities when they are accessed. This can help improve application performance by reducing initial data loading times.
  • Integration with Play Framework
    Ebean integrates seamlessly with the Play Framework, which is advantageous if you are developing applications using this framework, providing a cohesive development experience and reducing setup complexity.
  • Full-text Search
    Ebean provides built-in support for full-text search, enabling applications to perform search operations without relying on external search services, thus offering more versatility in how data can be queried and manipulated.

Possible disadvantages of Ebean ORM

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established ORMs like Hibernate, Ebean has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may result in less third-party support, fewer tutorials, and less available expertise, potentially increasing the learning curve for new developers.
  • Documentation
    While Ebean offers documentation, some users might find it lacking in depth compared to larger projects, which can make troubleshooting and advanced use cases more challenging to navigate without external help or experimentation.
  • Resource Intensive
    Ebean can be resource-intensive in terms of memory and processing, especially in cases of complex data models or when dealing with extremely large datasets, which might impact application performance and scalability.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    For highly specialized and advanced ORM tasks, Ebean might lack some of the features offered by more mature ORMs like Hibernate, which could necessitate additional work or integration with other tools for complex requirements.

Propel ORM features and specs

  • Active Record Pattern
    Propel ORM utilizes the active record pattern, which makes it straightforward to represent database tables as classes, simplifying CRUD operations.
  • Code Generation
    Propel provides a code generation tool that automatically generates PHP classes from your database schema, speeding up development and reducing boilerplate code.
  • Cross-Database Support
    Propel supports multiple database systems, making it a flexible choice for projects that might need to switch databases or support different environments.
  • Powerful Query Builder
    It includes a query builder that allows developers to construct complex SQL queries through a fluent API, improving code readability and maintainability.
  • Symfony Integration
    Propel integrates seamlessly with the Symfony framework, which can enhance the development experience for projects using Symfony.

Possible disadvantages of Propel ORM

  • Complex Configuration
    Propel's configuration can be complex and may require a significant learning curve, particularly for developers new to ORM or Propel itself.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layer introduced by Propel can introduce some performance overhead compared to raw SQL, which might be a consideration for performance-critical applications.
  • Limited Flexibility
    While Propel is powerful, the active record pattern can make it less flexible when dealing with very complex queries or non-standard database configurations.
  • Community and Documentation
    Compared to some other ORMs, Propel has a smaller community and may lack extensive documentation or community support, potentially making troubleshooting more challenging.
  • Mature but Less Maintained
    Propel has been around for a while, which makes it mature, but it has fewer updates and active maintenance compared to some newer ORMs.

Ebean ORM videos

Ebean ORM - fetch join @OneToMany maxRows treatment

Propel ORM videos

No Propel ORM videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ebean ORM and Propel ORM)
Web Frameworks
44 44%
56% 56
Development
46 46%
54% 54
Application And Data
42 42%
58% 58
Databases
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Ebean ORM and Propel ORM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ebean ORM seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ebean ORM mentions (4)

  • How do you guys go about the persistence layer?
    You can have a look at https://ebean.io/ ... Better control over the generated SQL, multiple levels of abstraction, can generate DB migrations and run the DB migrations, transparent encryption support, SQL 2011 history support, test against docker containers. Source: over 4 years ago
  • What do you whish for Spring 6?
    There is https://ebean.io/ and looks like it a community driven alternative to jOOQ. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Do you use code generators in your IDEs or some external ones? If so, which ones?
    Ebean ORM https://ebean.io/ was built to somewhat rival JPA (and JDBI) Btw: you can use java 16 records with ebean as DTOs, EmbeddedId and also as read only entity beans (and JPA implementations could similarly do so). Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Stop Using JPA/Hibernate
    I wouldn't call it micro, but https://ebean.io/ is pretty nice. - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago

Propel ORM mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Propel ORM yet. Tracking of Propel ORM recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ebean ORM and Propel ORM, you can also consider the following products

Beego - Beego Web is official blog and documentation website for beego app web framework

Mikro orm - TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns.

Hibernate - Hibernate an open source Java persistence framework project.

Dapper - Dapper is a user-friendly object mapper for the .NET framework.

Doctrine - An object-relational mapper for PHP that provides transparent persistence for PHP objects.

DBFlow - DBFlow is a super-fast, feature-rich, and easy-to-use ORM Android database library that automatically writes database-related code.