dwm is a dynamic window manager for X. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for the application in use and the task performed.
Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, dwm
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
70 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
70 vs 0
Linux popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
104 vs 2
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Lightweight dwm is extremely lightweight, resulting in minimal use of system resources. It is designed to have no unnecessary bloat, making it suitable for older hardware or low-spec systems.
Customizable dwm is highly customizable, with the configuration being done through editing the C source code. This allows for deep customization to meet specific user preferences.
Simplicity The software is designed with simplicity in mind. It has a straightforward design and a gentle learning curve for users familiar with tiling window managers.
Tiling Window Management dwm automatically arranges windows in a tiling format, which can help improve productivity by making better use of screen real estate and reducing the need to manually arrange windows.
Community Support A robust community following and good documentation provide ample support for troubleshooting and extending dwm. Many patches and tips are shared among users.
Possible disadvantages
Steep Initial Learning Curve For users not familiar with tiling window managers or who are used to traditional desktop environments, the initial setup and usage might be challenging.
Manual Compilation for Configuration Configuration changes require editing the source code and recompiling the window manager. This can be inconvenient for users who prefer a dynamic configuration option.
Limited Out-of-the-Box Functionality dwm does not come with many features available in other window managers by default. Users might need to apply patches or write custom scripts to get additional functionality.
Fewer Graphical Tools Since dwm focuses on simplicity and minimalism, it lacks graphical configuration tools, which might deter non-technical users or those who prefer GUI-based management.
Compatibility Some applications may not play well with dwm's tiling mechanism, requiring additional configuration or even the use of floating mode for specific apps.
Security Focus Socket provides a primary emphasis on security, offering tools and features that help developers secure their Python applications and dependencies against various vulnerabilities.
Dependency Analysis The platform offers thorough analysis of dependencies, allowing developers to understand the security posture of third-party packages in their projects and manage them accordingly.
Ease of Integration Socket is designed to integrate seamlessly into existing Python development workflows, minimizing disruptions while enhancing security.
Real-time Monitoring Socket allows for real-time monitoring of package security, giving developers immediate alerts about newly discovered vulnerabilities or issues in their dependencies.
Possible disadvantages
Learning Curve Developers new to security-focused tools might face a learning curve in understanding how to fully leverage Socket's features and capabilities.
Platform Limitations As with any tool, Socket may have limitations in compatibility with certain Python environments or frameworks, which could pose challenges for some projects.
Dependency on Tool Relying heavily on Socket for security may lead to a dependency on the platform, which could be a concern if there are outages or changes in support.
Possible Performance Overheads The security checks and real-time monitoring features, while beneficial, might introduce some performance overheads in the development process.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
dwmSocket for Python
Overall verdict
dwm is considered a good choice for users who value performance, simplicity, and customizability. However, it might not be suitable for everyone due to its steep learning curve and the requirement to modify its source code for customization.
Why this product is good
dwm (dynamic window manager) is known for its minimalistic design and efficient use of system resources. It is highly customizable through its source code, allowing users to tailor it to their needs. Being a product of the suckless community, it adheres to simplicity and clarity in its design philosophy, making it a favorite among users who prefer a no-frills, elegant solution to window management.
Recommended for
dwm is recommended for advanced users, programmers, and those who enjoy configuring software from the ground up. It's suitable for people who appreciate minimalism and have experience or a willingness to delve into coding and patching to achieve their desired setup.
Overall verdict
Socket for Python is a solid choice for teams wanting proactive, automated security monitoring of their Python dependencies, offering strong supply chain attack detection though it works best as part of a layered security approach rather than a standalone solution.
Why this product is good
Detects malicious code patterns, typosquatting, and suspicious install scripts in PyPI packages before they cause harm
Provides real-time alerts and PR-based scanning integrated into GitHub workflows and CI/CD pipelines
Offers a comprehensive dependency risk scoring system covering maintenance, quality, and security signals
Requires minimal configuration to get started with sensible default policies
Actively maintained with regular updates to detection heuristics as new attack patterns emerge
Reduces manual review burden by automatically flagging risky package updates and new dependencies
Recommended for
Development teams managing large Python codebases with many third-party dependencies
Organizations concerned about software supply chain attacks and dependency confusion
DevSecOps teams looking to shift security left into the development and CI/CD process
Open source maintainers wanting to vet contributions and dependency changes
Companies in regulated industries needing dependency risk visibility for compliance
Teams already using Socket for JavaScript/npm who want consistent tooling across language ecosystems
Spectrwm is a fast, compact, and brief reparenting and tiling window manager for X11 that is inspired by xmonad and dwm. It was created to address the problems that xmonad and dwm have. Also check Fulfillify alternatives
spectrwm is a small, dynamic, xmonad, and dwm-inspired reparenting and tiling window manager built for X11 to be fast, compact, and concise. It was created with the aim of solving the issues of xmonad and dwm face.
DWM is, well, a dynamic window manager. Tiling isn’t the only way you can manage your windows. It’s also possible to lay the windows out in a floating or monocle style. All modifications to DWM can be done within its...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
dwm70 mentionsSocket for Python0 mentions
OpenBSD 8.0
The best place to go for curated patches is here. You can customize these or roll your own once you have a chance to examine the source code. Dwm is very simple. https://dwm.suckless.org/.
- Source: Hacker News
/
16 days ago
Caffeine.wiki/x220, where Rodrigo Franco (caffo) tuned Arch + dwm on a Thinkpad X220 for a cheap, durable and low-profile machine he could use anywhere (sketchy coffee shops included).
- Source: dev.to
/
6 months ago
I can't remember the last time I resized a window. Does everyone not already install Magnet or an alternative first-thing to emulate the impeccable DWM? https://dwm.suckless.org/.
- Source: Hacker News
/
10 months ago
i3
Xmonad
Openbox
awesome
Fluxbox
bspwm
IceWM
Kite
Sourcery
