Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Dragula VS Materialize CSS

Compare Dragula VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

D
Dragula

A drag and drop library for developers

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
warmup.rocks
warmup.rocks keeps your CDN cache warm in every edge location worldwide: Cloudflare, Fastly, Akamai, CloudFront and more. Warming from 42 countries, hit-ratio analytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be a lot more popular than Dragula. While we know about 28 links to Materialize CSS, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Dragula.

social mentions
2 vs 28
Javascript UI Libraries popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
72 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

D
Dragula
Materialize CSS
Website bevacqua.github.io materializecss.com
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in
Flowcharts Javascript UI Libraries Development Org Charts +1
CSS Framework Design Tools Developer Tools Development Tools +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

D
Dragula 5 features
Materialize CSS 5 features
  • Simplicity
    Dragula offers a simple API that makes it easy to integrate drag-and-drop functionality into a project without extensive setup.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    Dragula has minimal dependencies, ensuring that it can be easily integrated into projects without the overhead of importing multiple libraries.
  • Browser Compatibility
    Dragula is designed to be compatible with a wide range of modern browsers, ensuring consistent performance across different environments.
  • Smooth Animations
    The library provides smooth and efficient animations, enhancing the user experience during drag-and-drop operations.
  • Customizability
    Dragula allows for a range of customizations through options and event hooks, giving developers control over its behavior and appearance.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    While Dragula is great for basic drag-and-drop functionality, it may lack the advanced features and flexibility offered by some other libraries.
  • Community Support
    Compared to more popular drag-and-drop libraries, Dragula has a smaller community, which can result in less frequent updates and fewer resources for troubleshooting.
  • Documentation
    Users have reported that Dragula's documentation could be more comprehensive, which might pose challenges for developers who are new to the library.
  • Integration Issues
    Some users have encountered issues when trying to integrate Dragula with certain frameworks or libraries, which might require workarounds.
  • Performance
    In applications with highly complex DOM structures or numerous draggable items, performance can degrade, making Dragula less suitable for very large-scale implementations.
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

D
Dragula
Materialize CSS

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Dragula is considered a good choice for projects that need efficient and straightforward drag-and-drop interactions. Its lightweight nature and cross-browser compatibility make it a preferred option for many developers.

Why this product is good

  • Dragula is a popular drag-and-drop library known for its simplicity and ease of use. It requires minimal setup, offers a straightforward API, and is compatible with modern browsers. It's especially useful for developers who want to implement drag-and-drop functionality without dealing with complex configurations.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for simple drag-and-drop integration
  • Projects where lightweight and fast performance is crucial
  • Applications that need compatibility with modern browsers
  • Teams that prefer a library with a straightforward API

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

D
Dragula 3 videos + Add
Materialize CSS 1 video + Add

FASHION PHOTO RUVIEW: The Boulet Brothers' DRAGULA Queens!

More videos

  • - IMHO: Dragula Review S03E01
  • - Hot or Rot? | Dragula Season 3 Episode 1 Review

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
D
Dragula
Materialize CSS
100% 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0%
0% 0%
Design Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Development
0% 0%
0% 0%
CSS Framework
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Dragula and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

D
Dragula no reviews yet
Materialize CSS no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Dragula yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

D
Dragula 2 mentions
Materialize CSS 28 mentions
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Dragula and Materialize CSS

When comparing Dragula and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...