Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Draft.js VS AxSoft

Compare Draft.js VS AxSoft and see what are their differences

Draft.js logo Draft.js

Rich Text Editor Framework for React

AxSoft logo AxSoft

WYSIWYG equation editor for Word and LaTeX.
  • Draft.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29
  • AxSoft Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-20

Draft.js features and specs

  • Rich Text Editing
    Draft.js provides a powerful framework for building rich text editors with a high level of customization, allowing developers to implement various formatting and styling options with ease.
  • Immutable.js Integration
    Draft.js uses Immutable.js to manage editor state, which can lead to improved performance and easier state management, as it helps avoid unnecessary re-renders and mutations.
  • Extensibility
    The library offers the ability to create custom blocks, decorations, and plugins, enabling developers to extend and tailor the editor's behavior to their specific needs.
  • Facebook Support
    Draft.js is developed and maintained by Facebook, which suggests a certain level of reliability and indicates a strong backing in terms of updates and community support.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library is well-documented, with comprehensive guides and examples that help developers get started quickly and understand the full potential of the framework.

Possible disadvantages of Draft.js

  • Complexity
    Draft.js has a steep learning curve, especially for developers who are not familiar with React or Immutable.js, as it requires understanding its unique architecture and concepts.
  • Bundle Size
    The inclusion of Immutable.js can lead to a larger bundle size for web applications, which might be a concern for developers aiming for minimalistic and fast-loading applications.
  • Limited Built-in Features
    Draft.js provides a basic editor out of the box, which means developers often need to implement or find third-party plugins for advanced features like tables, embedded media, or collaborative editing.
  • Customizability Overhead
    While high customizability is a strength, it also means that basic implementations may involve more boilerplate code and setup compared to other, more out-of-the-box solutions.
  • Sparse Updates
    Draft.js does not receive updates as frequently as some other open-source projects, which can lead to uncertainty around the timeline for bug fixes or new feature implementations.

AxSoft features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    AxSoft offers a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Comprehensive Features
    The platform provides a wide range of tools and features that cater to different business needs, enhancing productivity and efficiency.
  • Customer Support
    AxSoft is known for its responsive and helpful customer service team, which assists users with technical issues and inquiries promptly.
  • Customization
    The software allows for a high degree of customization to suit specific business requirements, providing flexibility for users.

Possible disadvantages of AxSoft

  • Cost
    Some users find the pricing of AxSoft products to be on the higher side, which might be a concern for smaller businesses or startups.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there can be an initial learning curve for users unfamiliar with similar software platforms.
  • Limited Integration
    AxSoft may have limited integration capabilities with certain third-party applications, which can restrict seamless workflow for some users.
  • Performance Issues
    Occasional reports of software lags or performance issues, particularly when handling large volumes of data.

Draft.js videos

Live coding โ€“ย Draft.js copy-paste fix

AxSoft videos

Writing a math equation using Axmath software

More videos:

  • Tutorial - AxMath Tutorial - Find and replace

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Draft.js and AxSoft)
Developer Tools
88 88%
12% 12
Text Editors
84 84%
16% 16
Rich Text Editor
80 80%
20% 20
Diagrams
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Draft.js and AxSoft. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Draft.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Draft.js mentions (28)

  • Rebuilding a web text editor
    Therefore, we wanted to choose a low-level framework that would solve most of the issues related to text input. We settled on Draft.js, which was quite popular at the time (2020). All we had to do was integrate it into our current system, attach it to the data storage, and implement the ability to edit styles with our constructorโ€”done. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Introducing react-rte-light: A Lightweight Rich Text Editor for React
    Are you looking for a lightweight, flexible, and modern rich text editor for your React applications? Look no further! I'm excited to share react-rte-light, a TypeScript-based rich text editor built with Draft.js. Itโ€™s designed to work seamlessly with React 16.8 to 19, offering a minimal-dependency alternative to heavier editors like React Quill. Whether you're building a blog platform, a note-taking app, or a... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Lexical 0.24 with Vanilla JS: Getting started
    Lexical is an open source project and considered the successor of Draft.js. It is primarily developed by Meta, licensed under MIT. It is not restricted to React, but supports Vanilla JS, too. The flexibility enables us to integrate it with other JS libraries such as Svelte and Vue. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Is there a licensable/free version of the "Substack" email editor?
    - https://draftjs.org/ If you're talking about liking the full experience with settings and previews, that I'm afraid is all custom built. I can't imagine an open source reusable one being out there, but I could be wrong! - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Which Rich Text Editor to use ?
    I've always used Quill and always satisfied with it. It can be adapted to React Native as well. Despite the most popular RTE is Draft js it has some limitations on mobile. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

AxSoft mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of AxSoft yet. Tracking of AxSoft recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Draft.js and AxSoft, you can also consider the following products

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Edtr.io - Intuitive WYSIWYG web editor, open source & fully adaptable.

Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

ProseMirror - A toolkit for building rich-text editors on the web

MediumEditor - MediumEditor is a simple inline editor toolbar built with JavaScript.