Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Docker Swarm VS Devilbox

Compare Docker Swarm VS Devilbox and see what are their differences

Modelence
Create production-ready applications with zero code sponsored
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Docker Swarm logo Docker Swarm

Native clustering for Docker. Turn a pool of Docker hosts into a single, virtual host.

Devilbox logo Devilbox

Cross-platform, Docker-based alternative to XAMPP.
  • Docker Swarm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-01
  • Devilbox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-05-04

Docker Swarm features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Docker Swarm is easy to set up and use, especially for those already familiar with Docker. It integrates seamlessly into the Docker ecosystem, providing a straightforward solution for container orchestration without the need for additional tools.
  • Native Docker Integration
    Swarm is built into Docker, meaning that Docker users do not need to install or configure another orchestration tool. This provides a consistent experience from development to production.
  • Declarative Service Model
    Swarm allows users to define the desired state of their services, and the system works to maintain that state. This includes scaling services up or down, and handling load balancing.
  • Easy Scaling
    Docker Swarm makes it easy to scale applications horizontally by simply changing the number of replicas of a service. The platform manages the distribution of these replicas across the available nodes.
  • Built-in Load Balancing
    Swarm includes built-in load balancing, distributing incoming client requests to running containers based on task states and node availability.

Possible disadvantages of Docker Swarm

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to Kubernetes, Docker Swarm has a more limited ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and third-party integrations. This can make it less flexible for complex or custom setups.
  • Less Feature-Rich
    Although sufficient for many use cases, Swarm lacks some advanced features that other orchestrators like Kubernetes offer, such as custom scheduling policies, complex networking configurations, and a broader range of storage options.
  • Community and Support
    The Docker Swarm community is smaller and less active compared to Kubernetes. This affects the available support, community-contributed tools, and overall development pace.
  • Scaling Limits
    While Docker Swarm can handle small to medium-sized clusters efficiently, it may not perform as well as Kubernetes in very large-scale deployments, particularly in terms of resource management and fault tolerance.
  • Future Uncertainty
    With Docker's increasing focus on Kubernetes, the long-term future of Docker Swarm is uncertain. This raises concerns about investing in a technology that might not be as actively developed or supported in the future.

Devilbox features and specs

  • Versatile Environment
    Devilbox provides a highly flexible and modular LAMP/LEMP stack environment that supports a variety of programming languages and databases, catering to diverse project needs.
  • Dockerized
    Being Docker-based, Devilbox ensures consistency across different environments and makes it easy to set up and tear down development environments without conflicts or contamination.
  • Multi-version Support
    It allows users to switch between different versions of PHP, MySQL, and other components effortlessly, facilitating testing across different system configurations.
  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Includes a wealth of tools and applications such as MailHog for SMTP testing, phpMyAdmin, and more, providing an all-in-one package for web development and testing.
  • Active Community
    Supported by a vibrant community, users can access documentation, tutorials, and forums that can help troubleshoot issues and optimize their setup.

Possible disadvantages of Devilbox

  • Complex Setup
    Initial configuration and understanding of the environment can be daunting for beginners or those unfamiliar with Docker, requiring a learning curve.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a Docker-based environment with multiple services can be resource-heavy, potentially impacting performance on lower-spec machines.
  • Limited GUI
    While offering comprehensive functionality, Devilboxโ€™s reliance on command-line operations might be less intuitive for users who prefer graphical interfaces.
  • Documentation Gaps
    Despite having extensive documentation, certain advanced configurations might lack detailed guidance, requiring users to seek community support or experiment independently.
  • Dependence on Docker
    As Devilbox relies on Docker, any issues or limitations with Docker can directly impact its functionality and usability, posing dependency concerns for users.

Analysis of Docker Swarm

Overall verdict

  • Docker Swarm is a good choice for small to medium-sized deployments where ease of setup and tight integration with Docker are priorities. However, for larger, more complex environments or when advanced features like custom scheduling and multi-cloud support are necessary, other orchestration tools like Kubernetes might be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

  • Docker Swarm is considered good for users who need a simple, integrated tool for managing containers across a cluster of hosts. Its main strengths include seamless integration with Docker, easy setup, and support for multi-host networking and scaling of services. Swarm is a part of Docker, and therefore it benefits from Docker's comprehensive ecosystem, tooling, and documentation. It is particularly suitable for scenarios where a lightweight and straightforward orchestration solution is desired.

Recommended for

  • Developers who are already familiar with Docker and want minimal learning curve for orchestration.
  • Small to medium-sized teams looking for easy-to-use, efficient management of containerized applications.
  • Environments where tight integration with Docker CLI and ecosystem is preferred over advanced orchestration capabilities.

Docker Swarm videos

+ Add

Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm | Container Orchestration War | Kubernetes Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - Roberto Fuentes โ€“ NodeJS with Docker Swarm

Devilbox videos

+ Add

devilbox - setup and workflow

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Docker Swarm and Devilbox)

Docker Swarm

Devilbox

Developer Tools
85 85%
Developer Tools
15% 15
Web And Application Servers
0 0%
Web And Application Servers
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Docker Swarm and Devilbox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Docker Swarm and Devilbox

Docker Swarm Reviews

Top 12 Kubernetes Alternatives to Choose From in 2023
With Docker Swarm, you can create and manage a cluster of Docker nodes, enabling the deployment and scaling of containerized applications across a distributed environment.
Source: humalect.com
11 Best Rancher Alternatives Multi Cluster Orchestration Platform
Next, we have Docker Swarm on our alternatives to rancher list. Docker Swarm is a lightweight container orchestration tool that lets you create, deploy and manage containerized applications. It is even one of the most popular container orchestration tools after Kubernetes.
Source: technicalustad.com
Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes: how to choose a container orchestration tool
Docker Swarm is an open-source container orchestration platform built and maintained by Docker. Under the hood, Docker Swarm converts multiple Docker instances into a single virtual host. A Docker Swarm cluster generally contains three items:
Source: circleci.com

Devilbox Reviews

12 XAMPP Alternatives โ€“ Install WordPress On Windows And macOS Laptop
The Devilbox is a modern and highly customisable dockerized PHP stack supporting full LAMP and MEAN and running on all major platforms. The main goal is to easily switch and combine any version required for local development.
Source: www.geckoandfly.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Devilbox should be more popular than Docker Swarm. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Docker Swarm mentions (3)

  • Ask HN: Why did K8s win against Docker Swarm?
    Docker Swarm Classic (https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm) is dead. Docker Swarm Mode is alive, and I know some people use it, but it's very niche compared to k8s. As someone who interacts with k8s regularly, I often feel like there is a place for a simpler k8s alternative. But looking at history I see the attempts like Swarm fail. What do you think played the decisive role in the k8s victory? Features,... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • K8s vs Docker Swarm
    So the thing is support for Swarm was delegated to Mirantis, https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-will-continue-to-support-and-develop-docker-swarm/ since it was delegated very little was done to move forward swarm _> https://github.com/moby/swarmkit/commits/master , docker swarm itself (docker the company) is deprecated https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm . I think because there's no way to... Source: about 3 years ago
  • #30DaysOfAppwrite: Docker Swarm Integration
    Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool built right into the Docker CLI which allows us to deploy our Docker services to a cluster of hosts, instead of just the one allowed with Docker Compose. This is known as Swarm Mode, not to be confused with the classic Docker Swarm that is no longer being developed as a standalone product. Docker Swarm works great with Appwrite as it builds upon the Compose... - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago

Devilbox mentions (16)

  • What are currently the best, simplest and/or cheapest MAMP and WAMP stacks in 2023?
    Https://devilbox.org if you're ok with the command line. Source: about 3 years ago
  • devs, how do you run a test web server?
    Use http://devilbox.org/ Comes out of the box ready and is close to your prod env then (php version, ..). Source: over 3 years ago
  • delboy1978uk/lamp v1.5.1 released. A docker LAMP stack comprising of an Apache webserver with self-signed cert, PHP 8.1 with Xdebug, Mariadb, and Mailhog. Comes with CLI scripts to simplify docker usage. Please have a play with it! :-D
    When we have giants like ddev and devilbox in our midst it's surprising to still see these pop-up. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Magento 2.4.5 Docker Setup
    Try devilbox, it works great, have everything you need for development, and kept updated: http://devilbox.org/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Status of xampp in webdevelopment
    Try Devilbox, it's a good Docker-based alternative for XAMPP. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Docker Swarm and Devilbox, you can also consider the following products

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

XAMPP - XAMPP is a free and open-source cross-platform web server that is primarily used when locally developing web applications.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

MAMP - MAMP is the abbreviation for Macintosh, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. It is a reliable application with its four components that allows you to access the local PHP server as well as the database server (SQL).

Docker Compose - Define and run multi-container applications with Docker

AMPPS - MAMP and WAMP stack with Latest PHP, Apache, MySQL and Softaculous. Install and manage apps like PHP, WordPress and much more with just one click.

Loading...