Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

dispy VS memcached

Compare dispy VS memcached and see what are their differences

dispy logo dispy

dispy is a Python framework for parallel execution of computations by distributing them across...

memcached logo memcached

High-performance, distributed memory object caching system
  • dispy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-23
  • memcached Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23

dispy features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Dispy provides a simple and intuitive API for distributing computations across multiple processors or nodes, making it accessible even for those with moderate technical expertise.
  • Scalability
    It supports both computation parallelization on a single multi-core machine and distribution across a cluster of nodes, allowing for scalable computing.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Dispy includes built-in fault-tolerance features like automatic re-execution of failed tasks, improving reliability in distributed computing environments.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, dispy fits well into the Python ecosystem and can easily integrate with other Python libraries and tools.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, dispy is free to use and modify, fostering community contribution and collaboration.

Possible disadvantages of dispy

  • Limited Documentation
    The documentation for dispy can be sparse or lacking in detailed examples, which may pose a challenge for new users trying to implement advanced features.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layer introduced by dispy might introduce some performance overhead, which can be a drawback in performance-critical applications.
  • Dependency on Python
    As it is a Python-based framework, dispy depends on Python and may not be ideal for integrating with other languages or non-Python components.
  • Community and Support
    As a project hosted on SourceForge, dispy may not have as large a community or as active development as some other distributed computing frameworks, potentially impacting the availability of support and updates.
  • Complexity in Setup
    Setting up a distributed environment with dispy might require additional configuration and setup, which can be complex for users unfamiliar with distributed computing concepts.

memcached features and specs

  • High Performance
    Memcached is incredibly fast and efficient at caching data in memory, enabling quick data retrieval and reducing the load on databases. Its in-memory nature significantly reduces latency.
  • Scalability
    Memcached can be easily scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the caching cluster. This allows it to handle increased loads and large datasets without performance degradation.
  • Simplicity
    Memcached has a simple design and API, making it easy to implement and use. Developers can quickly integrate it into their applications without a steep learning curve.
  • Open Source
    Memcached is free and open-source software, which means it can be used and modified without any licensing fees. This makes it a cost-effective solution for caching.
  • Language Agnostic
    Memcached supports multiple programming languages through various client libraries, making it versatile and suitable for use in diverse tech stacks.

Possible disadvantages of memcached

  • Data Volatility
    Memcached stores data in RAM, so all cached data is lost if the server is restarted or crashes. This makes it unsuitable for storing critical or persistent data.
  • Limited Data Types
    Memcached primarily supports simple key-value pairs. It lacks the rich data types and more complex structures supported by some other caching solutions like Redis.
  • No Persistence
    Memcached does not offer any data persistence features. It cannot save data to disk, so all information is ephemeral and will be lost on system reset.
  • Size Limitation
    Memcached has a memory limit for each instance, thus, large-scale applications may need to manage multiple instances and ensure data is properly distributed.
  • Security
    Memcached does not provide built-in security features such as authentication or encryption. This can be a concern in environments where data privacy and security are critical.

Analysis of dispy

Overall verdict

  • Dispy is considered a good choice for users who need a straightforward and effective way to distribute computational tasks. Its Python integration makes it accessible for developers familiar with the language and who need to implement asynchronous computations quickly.

Why this product is good

  • Dispy, available on SourceForge, is a distributed and parallel computing framework primarily written in Python. It allows developers and researchers to easily distribute computation-intensive tasks across multiple processors or computers. This is particularly beneficial for those in need of harnessing more computational power without diving deep into complex parallel computing concepts. Dispy provides simplicity and flexibility with fault-tolerance and dynamic allocation of resources, which makes it appealing for projects requiring scalability and efficiency.

Recommended for

    Dispy is recommended for data scientists, researchers, and developers dealing with computationally heavy tasks that can be parallelized, especially those already using Python. It is ideal for environments where ease of setup and execution is prioritized, and where complex distributed computing systems may not be feasible due to resource constraints.

Analysis of memcached

Overall verdict

  • Memcached is a solid choice for applications that require distributed caching to improve scalability and performance. It's particularly beneficial for web applications handling high traffic and needing fast, efficient data retrieval.

Why this product is good

  • Memcached is considered good due to its high performance, simplicity, and effectiveness in enhancing the speed of dynamic web applications by alleviating database load. It operates by storing data in memory, which allows for quick retrieval of cached objects and reduces the need to frequently query the database. Its distributed architecture, open-source nature, and widespread language support make it a flexible and reliable choice for caching.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking to improve the speed and scalability of applications.
  • Organizations needing a simple and effective caching solution to reduce database load.
  • Projects that demand quick deployment of a caching solution with support across multiple programming languages.

dispy videos

No dispy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

memcached videos

Course Preview: Using Memcached and Varnish to Speed Up Your Linux Web App

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to dispy and memcached)
Big Data
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
7 7%
93% 93
Stream Processing
100 100%
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using dispy and memcached. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare dispy and memcached

dispy Reviews

We have no reviews of dispy yet.
Be the first one to post

memcached Reviews

Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable | Hacker News
Quick ask: I donรขย€ย™t see รขย€ยœsomeรขย€ย of the other offering out there like MemCachedรขย€ยฆ what was the criteria used to select these? I donรขย€ย™t see any source of how the test where run, specs of the systems, how the DB where set up, etc. Would be very valuable to have in order to attempt to re-validate these test on our own platform. I also came back and saw some of your updates...
Memcached vs Redis - More Different Than You Would Expect
So knowing how the difference between Redis and memcached in-memory usage, lets see what this means. Memcached slabs once assigned never change their size. This means it is possible to poison your memcached cluster and really waste memory. If you load your empty memcached cluster with lots of 1 MB items, then all of the slabs will be allocated to that size. Adding a 80 KB...
Redis vs. Memcached: In-Memory Data Storageย Systems
Memcached itself does not support distributed mode. You can only achieve the distributed storage of Memcached on the client side through distributed algorithms such as Consistent Hash. The figure below demonstrates the distributed storage implementation schema of Memcached. Before the client side sends data to the Memcached cluster, it first calculates the target node of the...
Source: medium.com
Why Redis beats Memcached for caching
Both Memcached and Redis are mature and hugely popular open source projects. Memcached was originally developed by Brad Fitzpatrick in 2003 for the LiveJournal website. Since then, Memcached has been rewritten in C (the original implementation was in Perl) and put in the public domain, where it has become a cornerstone of modern Web applications. Current development of...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, memcached seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 37 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

dispy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of dispy yet. Tracking of dispy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

memcached mentions (37)

  • Redis vs. Memcached: How to Choose Your NoSQL Champion
    Memcached has a single, focused goal: to be a high-performance, distributed, in-memory object caching system. It stores all data in RAM, which means reads and writes are incredibly fast. But its main weakness is just as clear: data is completely lost when the service restarts, as it offers no persistence. Its data model is a simple key-value store, limited to basic get, set, and delete operations. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • MySQL Performance Tuning Techniques
    Memcached can help when lightning-fast performance is needed. These tools store frequently accessed data, such as session details, API responses, or product prices, in RAM. This reduces the laid on your primary database, so you can deliver microsecond response times. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • 10 Best Practices for API Rate Limiting in 2025
    In-memory tools like Redis or Memcached for fast Data retrieval. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: Handling increased user concurrency
    A caching layer using popular in-memory databases like Redis or Memcached can go a long way in addressing Postgres connection overload issues by being able to handle a much larger concurrent request load. Adding a cache lets you serve frequent reads from memory instead, taking pressure off Postgres. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Memcached โ€” Free and well-known for its simplicity, Memcached is a distributed and powerful memory object caching system. It uses key-value pairs to store small data chunks from database calls, API calls, and page rendering. It is available on Windows. Strings are the only supported data type. Its client-server architecture distributes the cache logic, with half of the logic implemented on the server and the other... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing dispy and memcached, you can also consider the following products

asyncoro - asyncoro is a Python framework for developing concurrent, distributed programs with asynchronous...

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Disco MapReduce - Disco is a lightweight, open-source framework for distributed computing based on the MapReduce...

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Spark Streaming - Spark Streaming makes it easy to build scalable and fault-tolerant streaming applications.

Apache Cassandra - The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.